Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581742›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2022

Spontaneous contractions of the human thoracic duct-Important for securing lymphatic return during positive pressure ventilation?

Benjamin Kelly, Christopher L Smith, Madhumitha Saravanan, Yoav Dori, Vibeke E Hjortdal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin KellyDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-4237
Christopher L SmithDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Madhumitha SaravananDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yoav DoriDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vibeke E HjortdalDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USAarhus University · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thoracic duct is responsible for the circulatory return of most lymphatic fluid. The return is a well-timed synergy between the pressure in the thoracic duct, venous pressure at the thoracic duct outlet, and intrathoracic pressures during respiration. However, little is known about the forces determining thoracic duct pressure and how these respond to mechanical ventilation. We aimed to assess human thoracic duct pressure and identify elements affecting it during positive pressure ventilation and a brief ventilatory pause. The study examined pressures of 35 patients with severe congenital heart defects undergoing lymphatic interventions. Thoracic duct pressure and central venous pressure were measured in 25 patients during mechanical ventilation and in ten patients during both ventilation and a short pause in ventilation. TD contractions, mechanical ventilation, and arterial pulsations influenced the thoracic duct pressure. The mean pressure of the thoracic duct was 16 ± 5 mmHg. The frequency of the contractions was 5 ± 1 min

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationThoracic DuctCentral Venous PressureHumansLymphRespiration, Artificialcongenital heart defectslymphatic contractionslymphatic interventionlymphatic physiologypositive pressure ventilation

Identifiers

PMID35581742
PMCPMC9114659
OpenAlexW4280539649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.