Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581731›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology and translational medicine2022

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Younghoon Kim, Nam Yun Cho, Gyeong Hoon Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Fusobacterium nucleatum, succinate signaling, and immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance and translational opportunities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Article
  6. Pathogenic Roles ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Intratumoural pksEBioMedicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Unraveling the Role ofCancers · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Gastro hep advances · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of Cancer · 2023
    Article
  20. Tumour Colonisation ofCancers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Younghoon KimLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Nam Yun ChoLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gyeong Hoon KangLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI14C1277Korean Ministry of Science and ICTMinistry of Health & Welfare, Republic of KoreaNational Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1F1A1061227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFusobacterium nucleatum has been identified to promote tumor progression in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, association between F. nucleatum and prognostic or clinicopathological features has been diverse among studies, which could be affected by type of biospecimen (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded or fresh frozen [FF]).

methodsArticles were systemically reviewed for studies that included the correlation between F. nucleatum and prognosis or clinicopathological features in CRC.

resultsTen articles, eight studies with survival-related features involving 3,199 patients and nine studies with clinical features involving 2,655 patients, were eligible for the meta-analysis. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were all associated with worse prognosis in F. nucleatum-high patients (p<.05). In subgroup analysis, only studies with FF tissues retained prognostic significance with F. nucleatum. In meta-analysis of clinicopathological variables, F. nucleatum level was associated with location within colon, pT category, MLH1 hypermethylation, microsatellite instability status, and BRAF mutation regardless of type of biospecimen. However, lymph node metastasis and KRAS mutation was only associated with F. nucleatum level in FF-based studies.

conclusionsIn conclusion, type of biospecimen could affect the role of F. nucleatum as a biomarker associated with clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Indexed as

Colorectal neoplasmsFusobacteriaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35581731
PMCPMC9119808
OpenAlexW4280498950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.