Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581699›Full record

ArticleJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2022

Dermatoscopically narrowed surgical margins for head and neck basal cell carcinoma: A retrospective case-control study.

Astrid Herzum, Martina Burlando, Pietro Paolo Tavilla, Claudia Micalizzi, Mattia Fabio Molle, Emanuele Cozzani, Aurora Parodi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Head and neck cutaneous basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of tumour features, surgical margins and recurrences.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Astrid HerzumDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Martina BurlandoDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Pietro Paolo TavillaDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Claudia MicalizziDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Mattia Fabio MolleDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Emanuele CozzaniDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Aurora ParodiDepartment of Dermatology, Di.S.Sal., University of Genoa, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
University of Genoa · ITMartin University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasal cell carcinoma (BCC) can cause extensive tissue damage if untreated. Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice, but especially in the head-and neck area, defining both radical and healthy skin sparing surgical margins is complex. MATERIALS AND

methodsExcised, small (≤ 1 cm), BCCs of the head and neck were retrospectively analyzed, comparing histological properness of surgical margins after clinical-dermatoscopical preoperative evaluation (cases), vs. clinical evaluation only (controls) and recurrences.

resultsOf 281 BCCs: 6 % (8/139) of cases and 8 % (12/142) of controls had unproper deep margins; 4 % (5/139) of cases, 20 % (29/142) of controls had unproper lateral margins (P < 0.001). Surgical 3 mm lateral margins were unproper in 0 % (15/66) of cases, 15 % (10/66) of controls (P > 0.005); surgical 1-2 mm lateral margins were unproper in 7 % (5/73) of cases, 25 % (19/76) of controls (P < 0.01). Of cases excised at 3 mm, 1-2 mm, and controls, 1.5 %, 0 %, and 7.7 % recurred, respectively.

conclusionsBCC excision at 3 mm may be appropriate in the head and neck for small, dermatoscopically well-defined and non-aggressive BCCs, attaining surgical cure rates of 100 % and 1.5 % recurrences. Excision at 1-2 mm should be reserved only for BCCs in very difficult-to-treat areas, as the surgical cure rate was only 93 %.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesHumansMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35581699
PMCPMC9321004
OpenAlexW4280585591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.