ArticleThoracic cancer2022
Comparison of recurrence risk between patients with clinically node-positive and -negative stage I non-small cell lung cancer following surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at increased risk of tumor recurrence following surgery remains a major challenge. The current study aimed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) rates after surgery between patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) and -negative (cN0) stage I NSCLC.
methodsPatients with pathological stage I resected NSCLC were identified from the lung cancer database of Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan. Patients with clinical N status 1 or 2 and pathological N status 0 were identified as the cN+/pN0 cohort, whereas others were identified as the cN0/pN0 cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between both cohorts. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate DFS.
resultsFrom January 2010 to July 2019, 754 eligible patients were enrolled into the study, among whom 41 (5.4%) were cN+/pN0. The median follow-up time was 43.4 months. Before PSM, the 5-year DFS rate was 79.0% and 90.3% in cN+/pN0 and cN0/pN0 cohorts (log-rank test, p = 0.009), respectively. After a 1:4 PSM, multivariate analysis showed that the cN+/pN0 cohort still had a poorer DFS compared to the cN0/pN0 cohort in (hazard ratio, 3.17; p = 0.040).
conclusionAmong patients with stage I resected NSCLC, cN+ patients had a worse DFS compared to cN0 patients. Surgeons should therefore consider more aggressive adjuvant therapy or frequent follow-up in patients with surgically resected stage I NSCLC with cN+ status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.