Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581608›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2022

Developing an artificial intelligence method for screening hepatotoxic compounds in traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine combination.

Zhao Chen, Mengzhu Zhao, Liangzhen You, Rui Zheng, Yin Jiang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Ruijin Qiu, Yang Sun, Haie Pan, Tianmai He and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A review of recent artificial intelligence for traditional medicine.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Application of artificial intelligence in the development ofFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zhao Chen *Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mengzhu Zhao *Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Liangzhen You *Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhengKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yin JiangKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu ZhangKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ruijin QiuKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yang SunKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Haie PanKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Tianmai HeKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xuxu WeiKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhineng ChenSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen ZhaoInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. zyyzc2007@163.com.
Hongcai ShangKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. shanghongcai@126.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. 2020M670236China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. 2021T140075National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFC1710400National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFC1710405National Natural Science Foundation of China No.81803963National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82104694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsTraditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine combination (TCM-WMC) increased the complexity of compounds ingested.

objectiveTo develop a method for screening hepatotoxic compounds in TCM-WMC based on chemical structures using artificial intelligence (AI) methods.

methodsDrug-induced liver injury (DILI) data was collected from the public databases and published literatures. The total dataset formed by DILI data was randomly divided into training set and test set at a ratio of 3:1 approximately. Machine learning models of SGD (Stochastic Gradient Descent), kNN (k-Nearest Neighbor), SVM (Support Vector Machine), NB (Naive Bayes), DT (Decision Tree), RF (Random Forest), ANN (Artificial Neural Network), AdaBoost, LR (Logistic Regression) and one deep learning model (deep belief network, DBN) were adopted to construct models for screening hepatotoxic compounds.

resultDataset of 2035 hepatotoxic compounds was collected in this research, in which 1505 compounds were as training set and 530 compounds were as test set. Results showed that RF obtained 0.838 of classification accuracy (CA), 0.827 of F1-score, 0.832 of Precision, 0.838 of Recall, 0.814 of area under the curve (AUC) on the training set and 0.767 of CA, 0.731 of F1, 0.739 of Precision, 0.767 of Recall, 0.739 of AUC on the test set, which was better than other eight machine learning methods. The DBN obtained 82.2% accuracy on the test set, which was higher than any other machine learning models on the test set.

conclusionThe DILI AI models were expected to effectively screen hepatotoxic compounds in TCM-WMC.

Indexed as

AIDeep learningDILIMachine learningSafety assessmentTCM-WMC

Identifiers

PMID35581608
PMCPMC9112584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.