Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

A kia ora, a wave and a smile: an urban marae-led response to COVID-19, a case study in manaakitanga.

Cheryl Davies, Carmen Timu-Parata, Jeannine Stairmand, Bridget Robson, Amanda Kvalsvig, Dominique Lum, Virginia Signal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheryl DaviesKōkiri Marae Hauora, Seaview, Wellington, New Zealand. c.davies@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-3485
Carmen Timu-ParataDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-9725
Jeannine StairmandTe Rōpū Rangahau Hauora A Eru Pōmare, University of Otago, 23a Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-902X
Bridget RobsonTe Rōpū Rangahau Hauora A Eru Pōmare, University of Otago, 23a Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3964-9408
Amanda KvalsvigDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-001X
Dominique LumSchool of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Virginia SignalDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-7444
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen COVID-19 emerged, there were well-founded fears that Māori (indigenous peoples of Aotearoa (New Zealand)) would be disproportionately affected, both in terms of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 itself and through the impact of lock-down measures. A key way in which Kōkiri (a Māori health provider) responded was through the establishment of a pātaka kai (foodbank) that also provided a gateway to assess need and deliver other support services to whānau (in this case, client). Māori values were integral to this approach, with manaakitanga (kindness or providing care for others) at the heart of Kōkiri's actions. We sought to identify how Kōkiri operated under the mantle of manaakitanga, during Aotearoa's 2020 nationwide COVID-19 lockdown and to assess the impact of their contributions on Māori whānau.

methodsWe used qualitative methods underpinned by Māori research methodology. Twenty-six whānau interviews and two focus groups were held, one with eight kaimahi (workers) and the other with seven rangatahi (youth) kaimahi. Data was gathered between June and October 2020 (soon after the 2020 lockdown restrictions were lifted), thematically analysed and interpreted using a Māori worldview.

resultsThree key themes were identified that aligned to the values framework that forms the practice model that Kōkiri kaimahi work within. Kaitiakitanga, whānau and manaakitanga are also long-standing Māori world values. We identified that kaitiakitanga (protecting) and manaakitanga (with kindness) - with whānau at the centre of all decisions and service delivery - worked as a protective mechanism to provide much needed support within the community Kōkiri serves.

conclusionsMāori health providers are well placed to respond effectively in a public-health crisis when resourced appropriately and trusted to deliver. We propose a number of recommendations based on the insights generated from the researchers, kaimahi, and whānau. These are that: Māori be included in pandemic planning and decision-making, Māori-led initiatives and organisations be valued and adequately resourced, and strong communities with strong networks be built during non-crisis times.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentCommunicable Disease ControlHumansIndigenous PeoplesNew ZealandPublic HealthCOVID-19Health equityIndigenous communitiesMāori

Identifiers

PMID35581600
PMCPMC9112650
OpenAlexW4280528672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.