ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2024
Temporality, Language and Body in Collaborative Remembering: a Videographic Study.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collaborative remembering involves bringing a story shared by a group of people back to the present. In this context, collaborative remembering has been studied following cues such as linguistic prompts that contribute to elicit memory in shared contexts. This study looks into collaborative remembering cues beyond their strictly linguistic character, which from a co-phenomenological standpoint comprises temporality, corporality and meaning making. A two-stage videographic analysis was required to undertake the study: (1) students partaking in meaningful interaction, and a (2) collaborative remembering instance, where two sets of three students met again, ten days after. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken, following Karl Bühler's organon model, simultaneously looking at bodily and temporal aspects, attending particularly to bodily motion coordination. Results show a pre-eminence of the appellative dimension alongside a prevalence of complementary over simultaneous patterns in collaborative remembering. A central aspect in this study is how collaborative remembering - including linguistic expressions- emerges as a coordinative phenomenon, where participants provide a joint account of remembered situations as a single being with a temporality of its own. These traits are discussed following a co-phenomenological approach to intersubjectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35581485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.