Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581485›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2024

Temporality, Language and Body in Collaborative Remembering: a Videographic Study.

David Rodríguez, Himmbler Olivares

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David RodríguezDepartamento de Psicología, Laboratorio de Psicología, Universidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, 4070386, Concepción, Chile.
Himmbler OlivaresDepartamento de Psicología, Laboratorio de Psicología, Universidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, 4070386, Concepción, Chile. hiolivares@udec.cl.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-3351

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 11181286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative remembering involves bringing a story shared by a group of people back to the present. In this context, collaborative remembering has been studied following cues such as linguistic prompts that contribute to elicit memory in shared contexts. This study looks into collaborative remembering cues beyond their strictly linguistic character, which from a co-phenomenological standpoint comprises temporality, corporality and meaning making. A two-stage videographic analysis was required to undertake the study: (1) students partaking in meaningful interaction, and a (2) collaborative remembering instance, where two sets of three students met again, ten days after. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken, following Karl Bühler's organon model, simultaneously looking at bodily and temporal aspects, attending particularly to bodily motion coordination. Results show a pre-eminence of the appellative dimension alongside a prevalence of complementary over simultaneous patterns in collaborative remembering. A central aspect in this study is how collaborative remembering - including linguistic expressions- emerges as a coordinative phenomenon, where participants provide a joint account of remembered situations as a single being with a temporality of its own. These traits are discussed following a co-phenomenological approach to intersubjectivity.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMemoryMental RecallVideo RecordingYoung AdultCollaborative rememberingCo-phenomenologyCross cueingOrganon model of languageTemporality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.