Trial reportScientific reports2022
Effects of ischemic conditioning on head and neck free flap oxygenation: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03474952 (Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning During Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning During Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of supraclavicular island flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- The Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Axial Flap to Study Ischemic Preconditioning Effects in a Rat Model.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- Free Flap Perfusion in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: Influence of the Number of Ischemia Intervals and Ischemia Duration-A Retrospective Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flap failure after microvascular reconstructive surgery is a rare but devastating complication caused by reperfusion injury and tissue hypoperfusion. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) provides protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury and reduces tissue infarction. We hypothesized that RIC would enhance flap oxygenation and exert organ-protective effects during head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery. Adult patients undergoing free flap transfer surgery for head and neck cancer were randomized to receive either RIC or sham-RIC during surgery. RIC consisted of four cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion applied to the upper or lower extremity. The primary endpoint, tissue oxygen saturation of the flap, was measured by near-infrared spectroscopy on the first postoperative day. Organ-protective effects of RIC were evaluated with infarct size of rat hearts perfused with plasma dialysate from patients received RIC or sham-RIC. Between April 2018 and July 2019, 50 patients were randomized (each n = 25) and 46 were analyzed in the RIC (n = 23) or sham-RIC (n = 23) groups. Tissue oxygen saturation of the flap was similar between the groups (85 ± 12% vs 83 ± 9% in the RIC vs sham-RIC groups; P = 0.471). Myocardial infarct size after treatment of plasma dialysate was significantly reduced in the RIC group (44 ± 7% to 26 ± 6%; P = 0.018) compared to the sham-RIC group (42 ± 6% to 37 ± 7%; P = 0.388). RIC did not improve tissue oxygenation of the transferred free flap in head and neck cancer reconstructive surgery. However, there was evidence of organ-protective effects of RIC in experimental models.Trial registration: Registry number of ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03474952.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.