ArticleRespiratory investigation2022
Clinical significance of chest CT for the exclusion of COVID-19 in pre-admission screening: Is it worthwhile using chest CT with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test?
Article in Respiratory investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA single reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is not sufficient to exclude COVID-19 in hospital pre-admission screening. However, repeated RT-PCR tests are time-consuming. This study investigates the utility of chest computed tomography (CT) for COVID-19 screening in asymptomatic patients.
methodsBetween April 2020 and March 2021, RT-PCR testing and chest CT were performed to screen COVID-19 in 10 823 asymptomatic patients prior to admission. Chest CT findings were retrospectively evaluated using the reporting system of the Radiological Society of North America. Using RT-PCR results as a reference, we assessed the diagnostic efficacy of chest CT during both the low- and high-prevalence periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.
resultsFollowing a positive RT-PCR test, 20 asymptomatic patients (0.18%) were diagnosed with COVID-19; in the low-prevalence period, 5 of 6556 patients (0.076%) were positive; and in the high-prevalence period, 15 of 4267 patients (0.35%) were positive. Of the 20 asymptomatic COVID-19 positive patients, chest CT results were positive for COVID-19 pneumonia in 8 patients. Chest CT results were false-positive in 185 patients (1.7% false-positive rate, and 60% false-negative rate). Pneumonia that was classified as a "typical appearance" of COVID-19 reported as false-positives in 36 of 39 patients (92.3%). Across the study period, the diagnostic efficacy of "typical appearance" on chest CT were characterized by a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 15%, 99.7%, 99.7%, 7.7%, and 99.8%; 20%, 99.6%, 99.6%, 4%, and 99.9%; and 13.3%, 99.7%, 99.7%, 14.3%, and 99.7%, in the entire study, low-, and high-prevalence periods, respectively.
conclusionsAddition of chest CT to RT-PCR testing provides no benefit to the detection of COVID-19 in asymptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.