Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35581098›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine mandates among New York City parents, November 2021.

Chloe A Teasdale, Scott Ratzan, Hannah Stuart Lathan, Lauren Rauh, Spencer Kimball, Ayman El-Mohandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chloe A TeasdaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: chloe.teasdale@sph.cuny.edu.
Scott RatzanDepartment of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY SPH, New York, NY, United States.
Hannah Stuart LathanCUNY SPH, New York, NY, United States.
Lauren RauhCUNY SPH, New York, NY, United States.
Spencer KimballEmerson College, Boston, MA, United States.
Ayman El-MohandesCUNY SPH, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School-based vaccine mandates improve vaccination coverage in children. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of parents in New York City (NYC) in November 2021 to measure acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for students, and for teachers and school staff. Random address-based sampling was used to recruit parents of children 5-11 years of age. Among 2,506 parents surveyed, 44.3% supported school-based vaccine mandates for students and 69.1% supported mandates for teachers and school staff. Asian parents, male parents, those with higher income, college education, those voting for the 2021 Democratic mayoral candidate and parents from Manhattan were most likely to support vaccine mandates for students. Among all parents, 25.1% said they would not vaccinate their child if required. Our data show only modest support for school-based COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children despite their importance in improving vaccination coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesMandatory ProgramsParentsVaccinationChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNew York CitySchoolsCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19MandateSchool-based mandatesSchool staffTeachersVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35581098
PMCPMC9091158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.