ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2022
Transitioning From S1P Receptor Modulators to B Cell-Depleting Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical, Radiographic, and Laboratory Data.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes after switching from fingolimod to B-cell-depleting therapies in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis and breakthrough disease on oral fingolimod or fumarates: results from the ARTIOS study.Journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- The Art of Sequencing Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Article
- Detecting New Lesions Using a Large Language Model: Applications in Real-World Multiple Sclerosis Datasets.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Effect of Prior Treatment With Fingolimod on Early and Late Response to Rituximab/Ocrelizumab in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- [15th Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: a review of the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress (Part II)].Revista de neurologia · 2023Review
- High-Efficacy Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) transition from oral sphingosine-1-receptor (S1P) modulators to anti-CD20 therapies for several circumstances. Optimal timing of this transition is uncertain, given competing concerns of rebound disease activity and ensuring immune reconstitution. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between inflammatory activity and the transition period from fingolimod to anti-CD20 therapies in a real-world MS cohort.
methodsMedical records were reviewed for all patients at our center transitioning from fingolimod to rituximab or ocrelizumab between 2010 and October 2020. Time periods reviewed were the following: before fingolimod discontinuation, interval between fingolimod and anti-CD20 treatments, and after the first anti-CD20 infusion. The primary outcome was clinical relapses; MRI activity, time to absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery, and infections were secondary. Clinical and demographic factors significant in univariable analyses were included in multivariable analyses.
resultsTransition data were available for 108 patients (68.5% women, 68.5% relapsing-remitting MS, mean age 44.6 years). The median (interquartile range) interval between fingolimod and anti-CD20 therapy was 28 (1-115.2) days. Six of 51 patients (11.8%) with intervals >1 month and 0/57 patients with shorter intervals experienced a relapse (MRI confirmed) within 6 months of fingolimod discontinuation. In the year following anti-CD20 initiation, 4/108 patients (3.7%) experienced a relapse (median 214.5 days after infusion). An additional 7% of those undergoing contrast-enhanced MRIs developed Gd+ lesions. ALC normalized following treatment switch in 89/92; the interval between treatments was unrelated to ALC recovery or infection. DISCUSSION: Delaying anti-CD20 start to monitor ALC after S1P modulator discontinuation may not be necessary and could increase rebound risk. ALC monitoring could instead occur after a rapid switch to anti-CD20 treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.