Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580795›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience research2022

Large scale similarity search across digital reconstructions of neural morphology.

Bengt Ljungquist, Masood A Akram, Giorgio A Ascoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell morphologies in the nervous system: Glia steal the limelight.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bengt LjungquistCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, & Plasticity and Bioengineering Department, George Mason University, Mail Stop 2A1, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, United States of America.
Masood A AkramCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, & Plasticity and Bioengineering Department, George Mason University, Mail Stop 2A1, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, United States of America.
Giorgio A AscoliCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, & Plasticity and Bioengineering Department, George Mason University, Mail Stop 2A1, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, United States of America. Electronic address: ascoli@gmu.edu.

Funding

Anatomical characterization of neuronal cell types of the mouse brainU01MH114829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A, DONG, HONG-WEI · 2017 to 2021
$13.9M
Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
Cytoskeletal mechanisms of dendrite arbor shape developmentR01NS086082 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A, COX, DANIEL N · 2013 to 2023
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH114829NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most functions of the nervous system depend on neuronal and glial morphology. Continuous advances in microscopic imaging and tracing software have provided an increasingly abundant availability of 3D reconstructions of arborizing dendrites, axons, and processes, allowing their detailed study. However, efficient, large-scale methods to rank neural morphologies by similarity to an archetype are still lacking. Using the NeuroMorpho.Org database, we present a similarity search software enabling fast morphological comparison of hundreds of thousands of neural reconstructions from any species, brain regions, cell types, and preparation protocols. We compared the performance of different morphological measurements: 1) summary morphometrics calculated by L-Measure, 2) persistence vectors, a vectorized descriptor of branching structure, 3) the combination of the two. In all cases, we also investigated the impact of applying dimensionality reduction using principal component analysis (PCA). We assessed qualitative performance by gauging the ability to rank neurons in order of visual similarity. Moreover, we quantified information content by examining explained variance and benchmarked the ability to identify occasional duplicate reconstructions of the same specimen. We also compared two different methods for selecting the number of principal components using this benchmark. The results indicate that combining summary morphometrics and persistence vectors with applied PCA using maximum likelihood based automatic dimensionality selection provides an information rich characterization that enables efficient and precise comparison of neural morphology. We have deployed the similarity search as open-source online software both through a user-friendly graphical interface and as an API for programmatic access.

Indexed as

NeuronsSoftwareAlgorithmsAxonsBrainLikelihood FunctionsNeuroinformaticsNeuronal MorphologyPrincipal Component AnalysisSimilarity searchSoftware as a Service

Identifiers

PMID35580795
PMCPMC9960175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.