Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580298›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker in Patients With Stage III and IV Wilms Tumor: Analysis From a Children's Oncology Group Trial, AREN0533.

Laura M Madanat-Harjuoja, Lindsay A Renfro, Kelly Klega, Brett Tornwall, Aaron R Thorner, Anwesha Nag, David Dix, Jeffrey S Dome, Lisa R Diller, Conrad V Fernandez and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Research progress on circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease in solid tumors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura M Madanat-HarjuojaDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5187-526X
Lindsay A RenfroKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Kelly KlegaDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-2003
Brett TornwallChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Monrovia, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-613X
Aaron R ThornerCenter for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-9160-7881
Anwesha NagCenter for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-1947-7429
David DixBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-5555
Jeffrey S DomeChildren's National Hospital and the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-9037-369X
Lisa R DillerDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.
Conrad V FernandezIWK Health Center and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-8306
Elizabeth A MullenDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-0002
Brian D CromptonDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9404-6621
Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBC Children's Hospital · CABroad Institute · USChildren's Oncology Group · USDalhousie University · CAGeorge Washington University · USKeck Hospital of USC · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
COG U24 Funding 2026-2027U24CA196173 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI Mignon Lee-Cheun Loh, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$62.5M
Support for Human Specimen Banking in NCI-Supported Cancer Clinical TrialsU24CA114766 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI RAMIREZ MILAN, NILSA DEL CARMEN · 2005 to 2014
$14.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114766NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses has not been established in the risk stratification of Wilms tumor (WT). We evaluated the detection of ctDNA and selected risk markers in the serum and urine of patients with WT and compared findings with those of matched diagnostic tumor samples. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifty of 395 children with stage III or IV WT enrolled on Children's Oncology Group trial AREN0533 had banked pretreatment serum, urine, and tumor available. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect ctDNA. Copy-number changes in 1q, 16q, and 1p, and single-nucleotide variants in serum and urine were compared with tumor biopsy data. Event-free survival (EFS) was compared between patients with and without ctDNA detection.

resultsctDNA was detected in the serum of 41/50 (82%) and in the urine in 13/50 (26%) patients. Agreement between serum ctDNA detection and tumor sequencing results was as follows: 77% for 1q gain, 88% for 16q deletions, and 70% for 1p deletions, with ĸ-coefficients of 0.56, 0.74, and 0.29, respectively. Sequencing also demonstrated that single-nucleotide variants detected in tumors could be identified in the ctDNA. There was a trend toward worse EFS in patients with ctDNA detected in the serum (4-year EFS 80%

conclusionctDNA demonstrates promise as an easily accessible prognostic biomarker with potential to detect tumor heterogeneity. The observed trend toward more favorable outcome in patients with undetectable ctDNA requires validation. ctDNA profiling should be further explored as a noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic tool in the risk-adapted treatment of patients with WT.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAKidney NeoplasmsWilms TumorBiomarkers, TumorChildChromosome AberrationsHumansNeoplasm StagingNucleotidesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANucleotides

Identifiers

PMID35580298
PMCPMC9462535
OpenAlexW4280568048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.