Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580267›Full record

ArticleNano letters2022

Determining the Cytosolic Stability of Small DNA Nanostructures

Divita Mathur, Katherine E Rogers, Sebastián A Díaz, Megan E Muroski, William P Klein, Okhil K Nag, Kwahun Lee, Lauren D Field, James B Delehanty, Igor L Medintz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Plugging synthetic DNA nanoparticles into the central dogma of life.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Piggybacking functionalized DNA nanostructures into live cell nuclei.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Nucleic acid nanostructures forApplied physics reviews · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Divita MathurCollege of Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-7292
Katherine E RogersCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.
Sebastián A DíazCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-0512
Megan E MuroskiCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.
William P KleinCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.
Okhil K NagCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3371-1223
Kwahun LeeCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4392-7466
Lauren D FieldCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.
James B DelehantyCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-3936
Igor L MedintzCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-4687

Funding

Cytosolic Access and Instability of DNA nanoparticlesK99EB030013 · NIBIB · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI MATHUR, DIVITA · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB030013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA nanostructures have proven potential in biomedicine. However, their intracellular interactions─especially cytosolic stability─remain mostly unknown and attempts to discern this are confounded by the complexities of endocytic uptake and entrapment. Here, we bypass the endocytic uptake and evaluate the DNA structural stability directly in live cells. Commonly used DNA structures─crosshairs and a tetrahedron─were labeled with a multistep Förster resonance energy transfer dye cascade and microinjected into the cytosol of transformed and primary cells. Energy transfer loss, as monitored by fluorescence microscopy, reported the structure's direct time-resolved breakdown

Indexed as

NanostructuresCytosolDNAFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMicroscopy, FluorescenceDNAcellcytoplasmDNA nanotechnologydyeFRETmicroinjectionnucleasestabilitytetrahedron

Identifiers

PMID35580267
PMCPMC9233082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.