Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580162›Full record

ReviewBlood2022

ROR1: an orphan becomes apparent.

Thomas J Kipps

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imaging of ROR1 expression in tumors using radiolabeled affibody molecules.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Advancing Immunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Inducing ferroptosis to improve cancer therapy: a promising tool for enhancing immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas J KippsCenter for Novel Therapeutics, Moores Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0064-4549

Funding

Non-canonical Wnt-Receptor Signaling and Targeted TherapiesR01CA236361 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its initial identification in 1992 as a possible class 1 cell-surface receptor without a known parent ligand, receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) has stimulated research, which has made apparent its significance in embryonic development and cancer. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was the first malignancy found to have distinctive expression of ROR1, which can help distinguish leukemia cells from most noncancer cells. Aside from its potential utility as a diagnostic marker or target for therapy, ROR1 also factors in the pathophysiology of CLL. This review is a report of the studies that have elucidated the expression, biology, and evolving strategies for targeting ROR1 that hold promise for improving the therapy of patients with CLL or other ROR1-expressing malignancies.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsHumansLigandsLigandsReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsROR1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35580162
PMCPMC10653015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.