Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580117›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Mind the gap: Mapping variation between national and local clinical practice guidelines for acute paediatric asthma from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

Charlotte Koldeweij, Nicholas Appelbaum, Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez, Joppe Nijman, Ruud Nijman, Ruchi Sinha, Ian Maconochie, Jonathan Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte KoldeweijRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6233-6544
Nicholas AppelbaumHelix Centre for Design in Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carmen Rodriguez GonzalvezHelix Centre for Design in Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joppe NijmanDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruud NijmanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ruchi SinhaDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, Division of Women and Children's Services, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ian MaconochieCentre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-8550
Jonathan ClarkeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health ACL 2018-021-007Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215938/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to standardize clinical care. Increasingly, hospitals rely on locally produced guidelines alongside national guidance. This study examines variation between national and local CPGs, using the example of acute paediatric asthma guidance from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

methodsFifteen British and Dutch local CPGs were collected with the matching national guidance for the management of acute asthma in children under 18 years old. The drug sequences, routes and methods of administration recommended for patients with severe asthma and the tone of recommendation across both types of CPGs were schematically represented. Deviations from national guidance were measured. Variation in recommended doses of intravenous salbutamol was examined. CPG quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II.

resultsBritish and Dutch national CPGs differed in the recommended drug choices, sequences, routes and methods of administration for severe asthma. Dutch national guidance was more rigidly defined. Local British CPGs diverged from national guidance for 23% of their recommended interventions compared to 8% for Dutch local CPGs. Five British local guidelines and two Dutch local guidelines differed from national guidance for multiple treatment steps. Variation in second-line recommendations was greater than for first-line recommendations across local CPGs from both countries. Recommended starting doses for salbutamol infusions varied by more than tenfold. The quality of the sampled local CPGs was low across all AGREE II domains.

conclusionsLocal CPGs for the management of severe acute paediatric asthma featured substantial variation and frequently diverged from national guidance. Although limited to one condition, this study suggests that unmeasured variation across local CPGs may contribute to variation of care more broadly, with possible effects on healthcare quality.

Indexed as

AsthmaAdolescentAlbuterolChildHumansNetherlandsQuality of Health CareUnited KingdomAlbuterol

Identifiers

PMID35580117
PMCPMC9113591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.