ArticlePloS one2022
Ensemble model for rail surface defects detection.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- LDMP-RENet: Reducing intra-class differences for metal surface defect few-shot semantic segmentation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Novel conditional tabular generative adversarial network based image augmentation for railway track fault detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- A Hybrid System for Defect Detection on Rail Lines through the Fusion of Object and Context Information.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Ensemble learning based transmission line fault classification using phasor measurement unit (PMU) data with explainable AI (XAI).PloS one · 2024Article
- Railway Track Fault Detection Using Selective MFCC Features from Acoustic Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of rail surface defects is vital for high-speed rail maintenance and management. The CNN-based computer vision approach has been proved to be a strong detection tool widely used in various industrial scenarios. However, the CNN-based detection models are diverse from each other in performance, and most of them require sufficient training samples to achieve high detection performance. Selecting an appropriate model and tuning it with insufficient annotated rail defect images is time-consuming and tedious. To overcome this challenge, motivated by ensemble learning that uses multiple learning algorithms to obtain better predictive performance, we develop an ensemble framework for industrialized rail defect detection. We apply multiple backbone networks individually to obtain features, and mix them in a binary format to obtain better and more diverse sub-networks. Image augmentation and feature augmentation operations are randomly applied to further make the model more diverse. A shared feature pyramid network is adopted to reduce model parameters as well as computation cost. Experimental results substantiate that the approach outperforms single detecting architecture in our specified rail defect task. On the collected dataset with 8 defect classes, our algorithm achieves 7.4% higher mAP.5 compared with YOLOv5 and 2.8% higher mAP.5 compared with Faster R-CNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.