Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580110›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Handheld dynamometer reliability to measure knee extension strength in rehabilitation patients-A cross-sectional study.

João Pinto-Ramos, Tiago Moreira, Frederico Costa, Helena Tavares, João Cabral, Cristina Costa-Santos, Joana Barroso, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06289218 (Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06289218 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsinterferential current, kinesio taping, exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

João Pinto-RamosDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-762X
Tiago MoreiraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Frederico CostaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Helena TavaresDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
João CabralDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Cristina Costa-SantosCINTESIS - Center for Health Technologies and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Joana BarrosoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Bernardo Sousa-PintoCINTESIS - Center for Health Technologies and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Handheld Dynamometer (HHD) has the potential to overcome some of the logistic and economic limitations of isokinetic dynamometers for measuring knee extension muscle strength. However, its reliability has not been fully assessed. The purpose of this study is to measure intra and inter-rater reliability of HHD for knee extension strength in patients receiving rehabilitation treatment, as well as to understand in which conditions is the reliability higher.

methodsTwenty-nine patients admitted in an inpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation unit were consecutively included in this cross-sectional study. Two experienced and two inexperienced physicians made two assessments of knee extension strength with HHD, separated by three hours. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), absolute differences between assessments, and correlations between strength and functional variables were calculated.

resultsIntra and inter-rater ICC were overall high (≥ 0.950 and 0.927, respectively). Higher values were found when average of two measurements were made for estimating intra-rater ICC (ICC = 0.978; 95%CI = 0.969-0.985) but not for inter-rater ICC. ICC were not statistically significantly different when calculated based on measurements performed by inexperienced physicians and experienced ones. There was a moderate correlation between strength and functional variables.

conclusionHandheld Dynamometer seems to be a reliable option to measure knee extension muscle strength, particularly when two measurements are performed and their average is reported.

Indexed as

KneeKnee JointCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35580110
PMCPMC9113580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.