Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35580034›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2022

Systematic Evidence Map for Over One Hundred and Fifty Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).

Laura M Carlson, Michelle Angrish, Avanti V Shirke, Elizabeth G Radke, Brittany Schulz, Andrew Kraft, Richard Judson, Grace Patlewicz, Robyn Blain, Cynthia Lin and 17 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An in vitro and machine learning framework for quantifying serum albumin binding of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Public Health Risks of PFAS-Related Immunotoxicity Are Real.Current environmental health reports · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Laura M CarlsonCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Health & Environmental Effects Assessment Division (HEEAD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3819-2952
Michelle AngrishCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-4806
Avanti V ShirkeCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-2505
Elizabeth G RadkeCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Brittany SchulzOak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Andrew KraftCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Richard JudsonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-9633
Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3863-9689
Robyn BlainICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1859-5554
Cynthia LinICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1221-2401
Nicole VetterICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-429X
Courtney LemerisICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-5216
Pamela HartmanICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Heidi HubbardICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-5577
Xabier ArzuagaCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Allen DavisCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Laura V DishawCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ingrid L DruweCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Hillary HollingerCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Health & Environmental Effects Assessment Division (HEEAD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ryan JonesCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Health & Environmental Effects Assessment Division (HEEAD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1401-9218
J Phillip KaiserCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lucina LizarragaCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5395-9192
Pamela D NoyesCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Michele TaylorCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew J ShapiroCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Health & Environmental Effects Assessment Division (HEEAD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-8092
Antony J WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-4821
Kristina A ThayerCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-618X

Funding

EPA 68HERC19D0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large class of synthetic (man-made) chemicals widely used in consumer products and industrial processes. Thousands of distinct PFAS exist in commerce. The 2019 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Action Plan outlines a multiprogram national research plan to address the challenge of PFAS. One component of this strategy involves the use of systematic evidence map (SEM) approaches to characterize the evidence base for hundreds of PFAS.

objectiveSEM methods were used to summarize available epidemiological and animal bioassay evidence for a set of

methodsSystematic review methods were used to identify and screen literature using manual review and machine-learning software. The Populations, Exposures, Comparators, and Outcomes (PECO) criteria were kept broad to identify mammalian animal bioassay and epidemiological studies that could inform human hazard identification. A variety of supplemental content was also tracked, including information on

resultsMore than 40,000 studies were identified from scientific databases. Screening processes identified 44 animal and 148 epidemiology studies from the peer-reviewed literature and 95 animal and 50 epidemiology studies from gray literature that met PECO criteria. Epidemiological evidence (available for 15 PFAS) mostly assessed the reproductive, endocrine, developmental, metabolic, cardiovascular, and immune systems. Animal evidence (available for 40 PFAS) commonly assessed effects in the reproductive, developmental, urinary, immunological, and hepatic systems. Overall, 45 PFAS had evidence across animal and epidemiology data streams. DISCUSSION: Many of the

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsAnimalsDatabases, FactualEpidemiologic StudiesHumansMammalsReproductionUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyFluorocarbons

Identifiers

PMID35580034
PMCPMC9113544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.