Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579766›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Development of the dog executive function scale (DEFS) for adult dogs.

Maike Foraita, Tiffani Howell, Pauleen Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maike ForaitaAnthrozoology Research Group, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia. m.foraita@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-882X
Tiffani HowellAnthrozoology Research Group, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-5792
Pauleen BennettAnthrozoology Research Group, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-4464

Funding

La Trobe University LTUFFR ScholarshipLa Trobe University RTP Stipend Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) are cognitive processes that are used to effortfully self-regulate behaviour and might be important for dogs' success in working and pet roles. Currently, studies are assessing dogs' EF skills through often laborious cognitive measures, leading to small sample sizes and lacking measures of reliability. A complementary method is needed. The aim of this study was to develop a dog executive function scale (DEFS) for adult dogs. Focus groups were held with people working with dogs professionally to refine a pool of items describing dog behaviours related to EF. A survey was distributed online to a convenience sample of N = 714 owners of adult dogs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified six distinguishable factors named behavioural flexibility, motor inhibition, attention towards owner, instruction following, delay inhibition and working memory. These factors appear similar to factors identified in human EF scales. Working dogs exhibit higher EF scores on the DEFS than non-working dogs. Dogs sourced from breeders exhibited higher DEFS scores than dogs sourced from shelters, and the amount of training received positively correlated with dogs' DEFS scores. The DEFS requires further validation with cognitive measures. The DEFS could then be used by researchers to complement assessment of dogs' EF skills through cognitive measures or assess dogs' EF skills in large samples.

Indexed as

DogsExecutive FunctionAnimalsAttentionHumansMemory, Short-TermReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioural regulationDog behaviourDog cognitionWorking dogs

Identifiers

PMID35579766
PMCPMC9113072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.