ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022
Demand-side Employment Interventions for Individuals with Common Mental Disorders: a Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of return to work for people on sick leave with depression, anxiety and stress: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraditional approaches to vocational rehabilitation tend to focus on improving worker skills and competencies rather than addressing barriers and inequities in existing workplace structures. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of current demand-side employment interventions that are aimed at building inclusive hiring and retention practices for persons living with common mental disorders (CMD). Methods Using the method advanced by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), and furthered by Levac et al., (2010), we carried out a scoping review to identify the range and breadth of literature exploring demand-side employment interventions for individuals with CMD. One rater screened titles and abstracts and two independent raters evaluated full-text articles against a set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. A descriptive analysis was conducted to highlight the state of the literature in this area. Results A total of 10 articles were retrieved, including six empirical papers and four theoretical papers. Three broad themes were extracted from the literature: (1) Workplaces as a determinant of worker health; (2) Unique interventions are needed for different work sectors; and (3) Individualistic perspectives embedded in demand-side interventions. Conclusions Demand-side employment interventions hold promise for building employer capacity to hire and retain people with CMD. There is a need for innovative approaches to engage workplace stakeholders in developing and evaluating innovative solutions to build inclusive workplaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35579666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.