Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579568›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.

Chao Yang, Yingkai Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extremely Randomized Trees to Determine Binding Affinity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Molegro Virtual Docker for Docking Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao YangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-6013
Yingkai ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-3354

Funding

Computational modulator design and machine learning to target protein-protein interactionsR35GM127040 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Yingkai Zhang · 2018 to 2026
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand scoring functions are widely used in structure-based drug design for fast evaluation of protein-ligand interactions, and it is of strong interest to develop scoring functions with machine-learning approaches. In this work, by expanding the training set, developing physically meaningful features, employing our recently developed linear empirical scoring function Lin_F9 (Yang, C.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingReproducibility of ResultsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35579568
PMCPMC9197983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.