Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579545›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of medicine2022

Algometry for the assessment of central sensitisation to pain in fibromyalgia patients: a systematic review.

Pablo de la Coba, Casandra I Montoro, Gustavo A Reyes Del Paso, Carmen M Galvez-Sánchez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06508385 (The Effect of Perception of Improvement Provided Virtual Reality Environment on Symptom Presence and Severity in Patients With Fibromyalgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06508385 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Perception of Improvement Provided Virtual Reality Environment on Symptom Presence and Severity in Patients With Fibromyalgia

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled39ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsBreathing exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Fibromyalgia interventions, obstacles and prospects: narrative review.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2023
    Review
  15. Chronic Pain: Clinical Updates and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Disrupted Sensorimotor Network Integration in Women With Fibromyalgia Revealed by Resting-State Functional MRI.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo de la CobaDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-3553
Casandra I MontoroDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-8600
Gustavo A Reyes Del PasoDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2188-8673
Carmen M Galvez-SánchezDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1927-0292
Universidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe pathophysiology of fibromyalgia (FM) is related to central sensitisation (CS) to pain. Algometry allows assessing CS based on dynamic evoked pain. However, current algometrýs protocols require optimising, unifying and updating.

objectives1) identify the dynamic pain measures used most frequently to effectively assess CS processes in FM, and 2) consider the future of the algometry assessing CS in these patients.

methodsCochrane Collaboration guidelines and PRISMA statements were followed. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42021270135). The selected articles were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) assessment tool. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched.

resultsThirty-four studies were selected, including measures such as temporal summation of pain (TSP), aftersensations (AS), spatial summation of pain (SSP), the noxious flexion reflex (NFR) threshold, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), cutaneous silent period (CuSP), and slowly repeated evoked pain (SREP); and evoked pain combined with neuroimaging. Each measure offered various advantages and limitations. According to ROB, 28 studies were of low quality, 3 of moderate quality, and 3 of high quality.

conclusionsSeveral pain indicators have been demonstrated to successfully examine CS involvement in FM in the last years. Algometry, especially when it involves diverse body sites and tissues, might provide further insight into (1) the evaluation of psychological factors known to influence pain experience, (2) new dynamic pain indicators, and (3) the simultaneous use of certain neuroimaging techniques. Further research clarifying the mechanisms underlying some of these measures, and homogenisation and optimisation of the algometrýs protocols, are needed. KEY MESSAGESAlgometry allows for assessing Central Sensitisation by applying dynamic evoked pain.The future of algometry could relapse in its combination with neuroimaging.Recently-emerged pain indicators should be considered for algometrýs new protocols.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationFibromyalgiaHumansPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdAlgometrycentral sensitisationdolorimetryevoked painfibromyalgia

Identifiers

PMID35579545
PMCPMC9122375
OpenAlexW4280536643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.