Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579511›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2022

Phase II Study of Ramucirumab Plus Irinotecan Combination Therapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: HGCSG1603.

Yasuyuki Kawamoto, Satoshi Yuki, Kentaro Sawada, Michio Nakamura, Osamu Muto, Susumu Sogabe, Yoshiaki Shindo, Atsushi Ishiguro, Atsushi Sato, Yasushi Tsuji and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Advancements in targeted therapy for gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuyuki KawamotoDivision of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-0015
Satoshi YukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-3062
Kentaro SawadaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan.
Michio NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1509-9811
Osamu MutoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-1962
Susumu SogabeDepartment of Medical Oncology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshiaki ShindoDepartment of Surgery, Nakadori General Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Atsushi IshiguroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Atsushi SatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yasushi TsujiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-5792
Masayoshi DazaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkudaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-6189
Takashi MeguroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazuaki HaradaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9577-1884
Mari SekiguchiData Center, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazufumi OkadaData Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoichi M ItoData Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yuh SakataMisawa City Hospital, Misawa, Japan.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshito KomatsuDivision of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-6802
Hokkaido University Hospital · JPSapporo City General Hospital · JPAkita Red Cross Hospital · JPHirosaki University · JPHokkaido hospital · JPHokkaido Research Organization · JPKeiyukai Sapporo Hospital · JPKushiro Rosai Hospital · JPMisawa City Hospital · JPNakadōri General Hospital · JPNTT Medical Center · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JPTonan Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRamucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody that inhibits tumor cell growth and affects the tumor cell microenvironment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan combination therapy as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to primary chemotherapy were included. Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg plus irinotecan 150 mg/m2 combination therapy was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months and secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug.

resultsThirty-five patients were enrolled between January 2018 and September 2019. The progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 26.5% [95%CI, 13.2%-41.8%, P = .1353)]. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.2 months (95%CI, 2.5-5.4 months) and 9.6 months (95%CI, 6.4-16.6 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 25.9% (95%CI, 11.1-36.3%) and disease control rate was 85.2% (95%CI, 66.3-95.8%). Grade ≥3 adverse events that occurred in >10% of patients included neutropenia, leucopenia, anemia, anorexia, and febrile neutropenia. No death or new safety signals with a causal relation to the study treatment were observed.

conclusionAlthough the primary endpoint was not achieved statistically, combination therapy of ramucirumab plus irinotecan showed anticancer activity and a manageable safety profile for second-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIrinotecanRamucirumabTumor MicroenvironmentVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIrinotecanRamucirumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agastric canceririnotecanramucirumabsecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID35579511
PMCPMC9355819
OpenAlexW4226504180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.