Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579508›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Acceptability of a Fentanyl Vaccine to Prevent Opioid Overdose and Need for Personalized Decision-Making.

Elissa R Weitzman, Joe Kossowsky, Laura M Blakemore, Rachele Cox, David J Dowling, Ofer Levy, Emma W Needles, Sharon Levy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elissa R WeitzmanDivision of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joe KossowskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura M BlakemoreDivision of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachele CoxDivision of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David J DowlingDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ofer LevyDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emma W NeedlesAdolescent Substance Use and Addiction Program, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sharon LevyDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe opioid epidemic worsened during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) comprise the most common drugs involved in overdose (OD) death. A vaccine that blocks fentanyl from reaching the brain to prevent OD is under development, and insight is needed into its acceptability.

methodsUsing a semi-structured interview guide, persons with opioid use disorder (OUD), family, professionals, and the public were interviewed about attitudes and concerns regarding a fentanyl vaccine. Reactions to fictional clinical vignettes of persons at risk of OUD because of pain and/or substance use histories were collected, analyzed, and quantified for favorability. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically.

resultsAmong N = 64 participants, (70.3% female, average age 32.4 years), attitudes were favorable toward a fentanyl vaccine, with preference for lifelong durability (76% of n = 55 asked). Perceived benefits centered on the potential for a life-saving intervention, suffering averted, healthcare dollars saved, and the utility of a passive harm reduction strategy. Concerns centered on uncertainty regarding vaccine safety, questions about efficacy, worry about implications for future pain management, stigma, and need for supportive counseling and guidance to personalize decision making. Reactions to vignettes revealed complex attitudes toward fentanyl vaccination when considering recipient age, health history, and future risks for addiction and pain.

conclusionsPositive responses to a fentanyl vaccine were found along with appreciation for the complexity of a vaccine strategy to prevent OD in the setting of pain and uncertain durability. Further research is needed to elucidate operational, ethical, and communications strategies to advance the model.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseFentanylOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMalePainVaccinesAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylVaccinesacceptabilityfentanyl vaccineharm reductionopioid overdoseopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID35579508
PMCPMC9376272
OpenAlexW4280630279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.