Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579469›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Evaluating the Ability to ID (COVID-19) NOW: a Large Real-World Prospective Evaluation of the Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 Assay.

K R Barker, L N Small, D V Thai, K Y Sohn, L C Rosella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing (December 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Implementation of isotermic PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K R BarkerDivision of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-6544
L N SmallDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
D V ThaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
K Y SohnDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
L C RosellaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CATrillium Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay is a rapid point-of-care molecular test for SARS-CoV-2 detection. In theory, it has the potential to decrease turnaround times (TATs) and rapidly facilitate patient flow and triage. Reports for its performance have been mixed, likely due to variations in patient cohorts, preanalytical considerations, and study design. We prospectively evaluated the ID NOW performance against reference reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) tests, using dual swabs. Patients presented at a large multisite academic hospital with the highest volumes of COVID-19 admissions in Canada. From 1,968 valid swabs, 186 were true positive, 1,760 were true negative, 21 were false negatives, and 1 was false positive. At 10.5% positivity rate, the positive and negative predictive values were 99.5% and 98.8%, respectively. This led to a modest increase in the pretest probability in this cohort of individuals presenting <7 days of symptom onset. The mean times from collection to laboratory receipt and receipt to reporting were 31 and 23 min, respectively. This reduced TAT observed in our study may assist with triage of admitted patients and breaking the chain of transmission through immediate notification of status. We also observed how test performance changed with prevalence, and thus, how the test is used to "rule in" or "rule out" disease must be considered. Although the ID NOW is regarded as a rapid test, it is not high throughput and requires rapid transportation times (<1 h) that may not be plausible in large centers. The utility of this test should be considered with the observed TAT and interpreted in the context of limitations discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19ID NOWPOCTrapid testingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35579469
PMCPMC9241745
OpenAlexW4280530427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.