Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579324›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Development and evaluation of a machine learning-based in-hospital COVID-19 disease outcome predictor (CODOP): A multicontinental retrospective study.

Riku Klén, Disha Purohit, Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas, José Manuel Casas-Rojo, Juan Miguel Antón-Santos, Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés, Carlos Lumbreras, José Manuel Ramos-Rincón, Noelia García Barrio, Miguel Pedrera-Jiménez and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Riku KlénTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Disha PurohitMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1442-335X
Ricardo Gómez-HuelgasInternal Medicine Department, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), University of Málaga (UMA), Málaga, Spain.
José Manuel Casas-RojoInternal Medicine Department, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Miguel Antón-SantosInternal Medicine Department, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-1100
Jesús Millán Núñez-CortésInternal Medicine Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos LumbrerasInternal Medicine Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Ramos-RincónInternal Medicine Department, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante Institute for 22 Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-9867
Noelia García BarrioData Science Unit, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Pedrera-JiménezData Science Unit, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Lalueza BlancoInternal Medicine Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
María Dolores Martin-EscalanteInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.
Francisco Rivas-RuizHospital Costa del Sol. Research Unit, Marbella, Spain.
Maria Ángeles Onieva-GarcíaPreventive Medicine Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.
Pablo YoungHospital Británico of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Ignacio RamirezHospital Británico of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Estela Edith Titto OmonteInternal Medicine Service, Hospital Santa Cruz - Caja Petrolera de Salud, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
Rosmery Gross ArtegaEpidemiology Unit, Hospital of San Juan de Dios, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
Magdy Teresa Canales BeltránInstituto Hondureno of social security, Hospital Honduras Medical Centre, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Pascual Ruben ValdezHospital Velez Sarsfield, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Florencia PuglieseHospital Velez Sarsfield, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rosa CastagnaHospital Velez Sarsfield, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ivan A HuespeHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bruno BoiettiHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Javier A PollanHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nico FunkeMax Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
Benjamin LeidingInstitute for Software and Systems Engineering at TU Clausthal, Clausthal, Germany.
David Gómez-VarelaMax Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-9419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New SARS-CoV-2 variants, breakthrough infections, waning immunity, and sub-optimal vaccination rates account for surges of hospitalizations and deaths. There is an urgent need for clinically valuable and generalizable triage tools assisting the allocation of hospital resources, particularly in resource-limited countries. We developed and validate CODOP, a machine learning-based tool for predicting the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. CODOP was trained, tested and validated with six cohorts encompassing 29223 COVID-19 patients from more than 150 hospitals in Spain, the USA and Latin America during 2020-22. CODOP uses 12 clinical parameters commonly measured at hospital admission for reaching high discriminative ability up to 9 days before clinical resolution (AUROC: 0·90-0·96), it is well calibrated, and it enables an effective dynamic risk stratification during hospitalization. Furthermore, CODOP maintains its predictive ability independently of the virus variant and the vaccination status. To reckon with the fluctuating pressure levels in hospitals during the pandemic, we offer two online CODOP calculators, suited for undertriage or overtriage scenarios, validated with a cohort of patients from 42 hospitals in three Latin American countries (78-100% sensitivity and 89-97% specificity). The performance of CODOP in heterogeneous and geographically disperse patient cohorts and the easiness of use strongly suggest its clinical utility, particularly in resource-limited countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HospitalizationHospitalsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studiescomputational biologyCOVID-19humanmachine-learningmedicinepredictionsystems biologytriage

Identifiers

PMID35579324
PMCPMC9129872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.