ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2022
COVID-19 Vaccination-Related Thoughts, Behaviors, and Expectations of the Academic Personnel in Hacettepe University Medical School.
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe World Health Organization announced the new coronavirus disease 2019 as a pandemic, as of March 11, 2020. The long-expected method to combat coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, that is, using an effective and widely available vaccine, has become reality by late 2020. This study was conducted prior to the national coronavirus disease 2019 mass vaccination campaign in Turkey to investigate the individual thoughts, behaviors, and expectations of the academic personnel on coronavirus disease 2019 vac- cination practices, who were among the pionneers in both vaccine trials and real-time coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine jabs. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe Hacettepe University Medical School has a total of 1692 academic personnel. All academicians were reached through their academic email addresses and invited to participate in the survey. Busy academic routines and coronavirus disease 2019-related duties limited response number to 213 academicians, after 3 consecutive reminders at 1 week interval. The survey was conducted using a standardized, 14 question-long questionnaire, using Google forms.
resultsOf the 213 participants, 60.6% (n = 129) were females and the average age (± standard deviation) was 40.2 ± 12.0 years. Of all, 17.4% (n = 37) had been reportedly diagnosed to have coronavirus disease 2019 prior to vaccination. A statistically significant posi- tive association was detected between coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination self-experience and recommending such a vaccination for relatives (P < .001); odds of recommendation was 19.5 times (95% CI = 4.2-89.6) higher among coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinated academicians compared to their non-vaccinated counterparts.
conclusionStudy participants are amongs the frontline workers, with expectedly the highest exposure rates from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. A significant proportion of academicians also play important role as scientific consultants and role models for the general public. Thus, their thoughts and concerns regarding public preventive measures and coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination practices are important for decisions health policy makers and administrators in charge of vaccine selection, availabil- ity, distribution, and allocation make, besides their self-responsibility in provision of evidence-based vaccine information for the general public, based on local needs and concerns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.