Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35579187›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2022

The Landscape of State Policies Supporting Family Caregivers as Aligned With the National Academy of Medicine Recommendations.

Katherine E M Miller, Sally C Stearns, Courtney H VAN Houtven, Donna Gilleskie, George M Holmes, Erin E Kent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Price of Care: Trends in Financial Transfers to Aging Parents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Support for Care Partners and Caregivers: 2023 Summit Session 5.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HCI and Older Adults: The Critical Turn and What Comes Next.Foundations and trends in human computer interaction · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine E M MillerDurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System.
Sally C StearnsGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Courtney H VAN HoutvenDurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System.
Donna GilleskieUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
George M HolmesGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Erin E KentGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points In the absence of federal policy, states adopted policies to support family caregivers, but availability and level of support varies. We describe, compare, and rank state policies to support family caregivers as aligned with National Academy of Medicine recommendations. Although the landscape of state policies supporting caregivers has improved over time, few states provide financial supports as recommended, and benefit restrictions hinder accessibility for all types of family caregivers. Implementing policies supporting family caregivers will become more critical over time, as the reliance on family caregivers as essential providers of long-term care is only expected to grow as the population ages. CONTEXT: In the United States in 2020, approximately 26 million individuals provided unpaid care to a family member or friend. On average, 60% of caregivers were employed, and they provided 20.4 hours of care per week on top of employment. Although a handful of patchwork laws exist to aid family caregivers, systematic supports, including comprehensive training, respite, and financial support, remain limited. In the absence of federal supports, states have adopted policies to provide assistance, but they vary in availability and level of support provided. Our objectives were to describe, compare, and rank state policies to support family caregivers over time.

methodsWe used publicly available data from the AARP Long-Term Services and Supports State Scorecard, the National Academy for State Health Policy, and Tax Credits for Workers and Families for all 50 states and the District of Columbia (2015-2019).

findingsWe found that states had increased supports to family caregivers over this five-year period, although significant variability in adoption and implementation of policies persists. Approximately 20% of states had enacted policies that exceed the federal Family and Medical Leave Act requirements, and 18% offered paid family leave. However, most states had not improved spousal impoverishment protections for Medicaid beneficiaries. For example, from 2016 to 2019, 24% of states provided fewer or no protections, while 71% of states did not improve spousal impoverishment protections over time. Access to training for caregivers varied based on eligibility criteria (e.g., select populations and/or only co-residing caregivers).

conclusionsOverall, state approaches to support family caregivers vary by eligibility and scope of services. Substantial gaps in support of caregivers, particularly economic supports, persist. Although the landscape of state policies supporting caregivers has improved over time, few states provide financial supports as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine, and benefit restrictions hinder accessibility for all family caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversMedicaidHealth PolicyHumansLong-Term CareNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionUnited Stateseconomic policyfamily caregiverhealth policylong-term services and supportsMedicaidMedicare

Identifiers

PMID35579187
PMCPMC9576229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.