ArticleESC heart failure2022
The association between cardiac involvement and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac MRI in cardiac dystrophinopathy: recommendations on imaging.Open heart · 2026Review
- Current Trends in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Research and Therapy: 3D Cardiac Modelling.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Review
- Wireless Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitor Implantation in a Patient with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Left ventricular concentric hypertrophy with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves risk stratification in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a prospective cohort study.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Electrocardiographic and Autonomic Nervous System Changes after Changes in the Posture of Children and Adolescents with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Cardiomyopathy as cause of death in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a longitudinal observational study.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- The association between cardiac involvement and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Comprehensive multidisciplinary care for adult Duchenne muscular dystrophy in South Korea.Journal of neuromuscular diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsDespite advances in contemporary cardiopulmonary therapies, cardiomyopathy remains the leading cause of death in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Also, the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with DMD and cardiomyopathy is unknown. This study investigated long-term clinical outcomes and their associated factors in patients with late-stage DMD. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 116 patients with late-stage DMD (age > 15 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All enrolled patients were followed up at a single tertiary referral hospital. LV systolic dysfunction was dichotomously defined as reduced [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%] vs. preserved [>40%] based on the initial echocardiographic result. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoint was a composite event defined as death or unexpected hospitalization due to cardiovascular reasons including chest pain, dyspnoea, and generalized oedema. The patients were divided into preserved (n = 84, 72.4%) and reduced LVEF groups (n = 32, 27.6%). The mean age was 20.8 ± 5.9 years, the mean disease duration, 8.8 ± 3.7 years, and the mean follow-up duration, 1708 ± 659 days. For primary endpoint, the reduced LVEF group showed a lower rate of overall survival (Reduced LVEF vs. Preserved LVEF; 81.3% vs. 98.8%, log-rank P = 0.005). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, brain-natriuretic peptide (BNP) level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.088, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.019-1.162, P = 0.011) and diuretic use (adjusted HR 9.279, 95%CI 1.651-52.148, P = 0.011) were significant predictors of all-cause death in patients with DMD. For the secondary endpoint, the reduced LVEF group had a lower rate of freedom from composite events than the preserved LVEF group (65.6% vs. 86.9%, log-rank P = 0.005). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, BNP level (adjusted HR 1.057, 95%CI 1.005-1.112, P = 0.032) and diuretic use (adjusted HR 4.189, 95% CI 1.704-10.296, P = 0.002) were significant predictors of the composite event in patients with DMD.
conclusionsPatients with DMD and reduced LVEF had worse clinical outcomes than those with preserved LVEF. BNP level and diuretic use were associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with late-stage DMD, irrespective of LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.