Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578830›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

Health surveillance indicators for diet and physical activity: what is available in European data sets for policy evaluation?

Isobel Stanley, Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Gert B M Mensink, Lina Garnica Rosas, Stefanie Do, Karim Abu Omar, Catherine Woods, Wolfgang Ahrens, Antje Hebestreit and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Isobel StanleySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-299X
Agnieszka Neumann-PodczaskaPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-TobisPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Gert B M MensinkRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Lina Garnica RosasRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie DoLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Karim Abu OmarDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-7013
Catherine WoodsDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Physical Activity for Health, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Wolfgang AhrensLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Antje HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Celine MurrinSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
PEN Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicies targeting diet and physical activity have the potential to improve health and well-being at a population level. However, the impact of these policies in Europe is currently unknown. Based on existing data, as well as on a needs assessment, we derived a catalogue of indicators that can be employed to evaluate such policies. These indicators may also inform the further development and harmonization of surveillance systems.

methodsForty EU experts agreed on a list of key indicators and ranked their priority for future surveillance. We mapped these indicators onto variables provided by ongoing European surveillance systems. Using a Likert scale (well matched, somewhat matched, poorly matched, unmatched), we assessed the suitability of these variables as measures for the indicators.

resultsKey indicators included behaviour outcome indicators relating to diet (n = 72) and physical activity and sedentary behaviour (n = 67) as well as upstream determinants of these behaviours. It was possible to map 72% of diet indicators and 86% of physical activity and sedentary behaviour indicators onto at least one variable in an ongoing surveillance system.

conclusionsCurrent monitoring and surveillance systems focus mainly on measuring 'downstream' indicators, while gaps exist in policy and environmental level data in dimensions such as inequality, funding and resources and governance.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorDietEuropeHealth PolicyHumansPolicy

Identifiers

PMID35578830
PMCPMC9341672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.