Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578827›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2022

Case fatality risk of diarrhoeal pathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ernest O Asare, Dianna Hergott, Jessica Seiler, Brooks Morgan, Helena Archer, Alison B Wiyeh, Boya Guo, Matt Driver, Birgitte Giersing, Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Consequences of Shigella infection in young children: a systematic review.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ernest O AsareDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-8755
Dianna HergottDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jessica SeilerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brooks MorganDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Helena ArcherDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alison B WiyehDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Boya GuoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matt DriverDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Birgitte GiersingVaccine Product Delivery Research, Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mateusz Hasso-AgopsowiczVaccine Product Delivery Research, Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jairam LingappaDepartments of Global Health, Medicine, and Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Benjamin A LopmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Virginia E PitzerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Modeling the impact and cost-effectiveness of next-generation rotavirus vaccine strategies in low- and middle-income countriesR01AI112970 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PITZER, VIRGINIA E · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112970World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimates of the relative contribution of different pathogens to all-cause diarrhoea mortality are needed to inform global diarrhoea burden models and prioritize interventions. We aimed to investigate and estimate heterogeneity in the case fatality risk (CFR) of different diarrhoeal pathogens.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported cases and deaths for 15 enteric pathogens published between 1990 and 2019. The primary outcome was the pathogen-specific CFR stratified by age group, country-specific under-5 mortality rate, setting, study year and rotavirus vaccine introduction status. We developed fixed-effects and multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate the pooled CFR overall and for each pathogen, controlling for potential predictors of heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 416 studies met review criteria and were included in the analysis. The overall crude CFR for all pathogens was 0.65%, but there was considerable heterogeneity between and within studies. The overall CFR estimated from a random-effects model was 0.04% (95% CI: 0.026%-0.062%), whereas the pathogen-specific CFR estimates ranged from 0% to 2.7%. When pathogens were included as predictors of the CFR in the overall model, the highest and lowest odds ratios were found for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) [odds ratio (OR) = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.28-7.07] and rotavirus (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.13-0.39), respectively.

conclusionWe provide comprehensive estimates of the CFR across different diarrhoeal pathogens and highlight pathogens for which more studies are needed. The results motivate the need for diarrhoeal interventions and could help prioritize pathogens for vaccine development.

Indexed as

Rotavirus VaccinesDiarrheaHumansOdds RatioRotavirus VaccinesCase fatality ratiodeathdiarrhoeaheterogeneitymortality

Identifiers

PMID35578827
PMCPMC9557849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.