Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578717›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STEM education2022

Institutionalizing evidence-based STEM reform through faculty professional development and support structures.

Sreyasi Biswas, Rocio Benabentos, Eric Brewe, Geoff Potvin, Julian Edward, Marcy Kravec, Laird Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STEM education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sreyasi BiswasTaylor Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Rocio BenabentosSTEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-2152
Eric BreweDepartment of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-6451
Geoff PotvinSTEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-2309
Julian EdwardDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
Marcy KravecDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
Laird KramerSTEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1035-8471
Florida International University · USDrexel University · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Even though student-centered instruction leads to positive student outcomes, direct instruction methods are still prevalent. Multiple barriers prevent faculty from further adopting evidence-based student-centered practices and holistic approaches to faculty support are necessary to promote faculty change. The Collaborative for Institutionalizing Scientific Learning (CISL) is an HHMI-funded program to reform undergraduate science and mathematics education at a large Hispanic-Serving public research university. The program has established a Faculty Scholar support model to impact the number of science and mathematics faculty using evidence-based practices in their classrooms. Through this program, Scholars are selected to undertake a transformation of a course of their choice and conduct an assessment of the impact of the reform on students-while receiving multiple supports including summer salary, undergraduate Learning Assistants, professional development, course assessment and education research support, and opportunities to develop manuscripts on their course transformations. Results: CISL has supported over 40 Faculty Scholars in the transformation of both introductory and upper division biology, chemistry, physics and mathematics courses. Faculty are motivated to transform a course due to factors related to their own experiences and beliefs, their students' needs, the course structure, and/or departmental elements. Quantitative analysis of the impact of the project on student success show that, overall, students in CISL-supported courses have higher passing rates compared to students in traditional classrooms. Survey and interviews of Faculty Scholars identified that the most valuable elements of the program were the personnel support from undergraduate Learning Assistants during reform implementation and guidance from the program's Assistant Director during design, implementation and evaluation. Conclusions: The CISL program provides an example of significant effort sustained over several years to systematically improve the quality and culture of undergraduate education in a large research-intensive Hispanic Serving Institution. The program has had an overall positive impact on the professional development of Faculty Scholars and led to an increase in the number of STEM courses implementing evidence-based teaching practices, thus, taking a step towards solidifying a culture of evidence-based instructional strategies in STEM departments. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40594-022-00353-z.

Indexed as

Instructional changePost-secondary facultyProfessional development

Identifiers

PMID35578717
PMCPMC9098573
OpenAlexW4280581136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.