Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578715›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022

Cleanup Sketched Drawings: Deep Learning-Based Model.

Amal Ahmed Hasan Mohammed, Jiazhou Chen

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amal Ahmed Hasan MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-0478
Jiazhou ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-6146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rough drawings provide artists with a simple and efficient way to express shapes and ideas. Artists frequently use sketches to highlight their envisioned curves, using several groups' raw strokes. These rough sketches need enhancement to remove some subtle impurities and completely simplify curves over the sketched images. This research paper proposes using a fully convolutional network (FCNN) model to simplify rough raster drawings using deep learning. As input, the FCNN takes a sketch image of any size and automatically generates a high-quality simplified sketch image as output. Our model intuitively addresses the shortcomings in the rough sketch image, such as noises and unwanted background, as well as the low resolution of the rough sketch image. The FCNN model is trained by three raster image datasets, which are publicly available online. This paper demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of using deep learning in cleaning and improving the roughly drawn image in an automatic way. For evaluating the results, the mean squared error (MSE) metric was used. From experimental results, it was observed that an enhanced FCNN model reported better accuracy, reducing the prediction error by 0.08 percent for simplifying the rough sketch compared to the existing methods.

Identifiers

PMID35578715
PMCPMC9107365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.