Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578658›Full record

ArticleClinical infection in practice2022

Safety and efficacy of favipiravir for the management of COVID-19 patients: A preliminary randomized control trial.

S M Abdur Rahman, Ahmedul Kabir, A B M Abdullah, Md Billal Alam, Khan Abul Kalam Azad, Md Titu Miah, Syed Ghulam Mogni Mowla, Sudip Ranjan Deb, Mohammad Robed Amin, Muhammad Asaduzzaman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infection in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Favipiravir for treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S M Abdur RahmanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Ahmedul KabirDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
A B M AbdullahFaculty of Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Md Billal AlamDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Khan Abul Kalam AzadDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Md Titu MiahDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Syed Ghulam Mogni MowlaDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Sudip Ranjan DebDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Robed AminDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Muhammad AsaduzzamanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kuwait Bangladesh Maitry Govt. Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dhaka Medical College and Hospital · BDBangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University · BDUniversity of Dhaka · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The novel coronavirus disease, commonly called COVID-19, has already killed millions of lives. Our study aimed to identify a safe and right drug for the management of such globally threatened COVID-19. Methods: This preliminary double-blinded randomized controlled trial was done among 57 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the early stage of their illness. Of them, 29 patients received Favipiravir (FVP) and the remaining 28 patients received a placebo under the standard of care. Among the patients, 4 from Favipiravir (FVP) group and 3 from the placebo group were discontinued. The patients were observed regularly for a period of 10 days. Result: In our study, the FVP treated group showed accelerated viral clearance compared to the placebo-treated group. Assessment of chest X-ray showed remarkable improvement of pheumonia patient in group A compared to Group B. Hematological and Biochemical parameters such as total WBC count, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were examined. No significant differences in the hematological parameters such as WBC count, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in Group A and Group B patients. Liver transaminases levels were also stable in FVP treated group (average ALT ranges 39.4-46.2; AST 28.2-32.8). Conclusion: The drug Favipiravir displayed remarkable improvements in the clinical conditions and recovery of COVID-19 patients at the early stages of their infections.

Indexed as

BangladeshCOVID-19FavipiravirFVP, FavipiravirInfectious diseaseSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35578658
PMCPMC9095067
OpenAlexW4280515333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.