Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578409›Full record

Trial reportThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2022

A Virtual, Simulated Code White for Undergraduate Nursing Students.

Tracey Stephen, Keith King, Mischa Taylor, Margot Jackson, Carla Hilario

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Violence from patients and visitors in the emergency department - reporting of aggression by medical staff.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracey StephenFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-8758
Keith KingFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mischa TaylorFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Margot JacksonFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Carla HilarioFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses and nursing students are increasingly vulnerable to workplace violence, both verbal and physical, as health care settings and clients cope with unprecedented challenges including the COVID-19 pandemic. Concurrently, clinical learning opportunities for nursing students have been curtailed by public health restrictions and limited capacity. While virtual simulations have been promoted as an alternative to clinical hours, their effectiveness as an educational intervention on workplace violence has yet to be assessed. PURPOSE: The authors sought to evaluate a virtual, simulated code white-a set of organized responses to a client, visitor, or staff member exhibiting the potential for violence-involving 4th year undergraduate nursing students, randomly sorted into an intervention group and a control group.

methodsPre and post test measures of knowledge and attitudes about mental health, workplace violence and virtual simulation were collected, as well as qualitative data from focus groups.

findingsWhile the sample size (n = 24) was insufficient to detect meaningful differences between the intervention and control groups, descriptive statistics and focus group data revealed significant gaps in participants' knowledge around managing workplace violence. Participants rated the virtual simulation highly for its realism and the opportunity to experience working in a virtual environment, while they felt the preamble and debrief were too short.

conclusionsThe findings illustrate a virtual code white simulation has clear educational benefits, and that multiple iterations, both virtual and in person, would most likely increase the benefits of the intervention.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingWorkplace ViolenceHumansPandemicsCode whiteCOVID-19mental healthundergraduate nursing educationvirtual simulationworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID35578409
PMCPMC9379387
OpenAlexW4280513245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.