Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578372›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2022

Machine learned daily life history classification using low frequency tracking data and automated modelling pipelines: application to North American waterfowl.

Cory Overton, Michael Casazza, Joseph Bretz, Fiona McDuie, Elliott Matchett, Desmond Mackell, Austen Lorenz, Andrea Mott, Mark Herzog, Josh Ackerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cory OvertonWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA. coverton@usgs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-7447
Michael CasazzaWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Joseph BretzCloud Hosting Solutions, U.S. Geological Survey, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Fiona McDuieWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Elliott MatchettWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Desmond MackellWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Austen LorenzWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Andrea MottWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Mark HerzogWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.
Josh AckermanWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying animal behaviors, life history states, and movement patterns is a prerequisite for many animal behavior analyses and effective management of wildlife and habitats. Most approaches classify short-term movement patterns with high frequency location or accelerometry data. However, patterns reflecting life history across longer time scales can have greater relevance to species biology or management needs, especially when available in near real-time. Given limitations in collecting and using such data to accurately classify complex behaviors in the long-term, we used hourly GPS data from 5 waterfowl species to produce daily activity classifications with machine-learned models using "automated modelling pipelines".

methodsAutomated pipelines are computer-generated code that complete many tasks including feature engineering, multi-framework model development, training, validation, and hyperparameter tuning to produce daily classifications from eight activity patterns reflecting waterfowl life history or movement states. We developed several input features for modeling grouped into three broad categories, hereafter "feature sets": GPS locations, habitat information, and movement history. Each feature set used different data sources or data collected across different time intervals to develop the "features" (independent variables) used in models.

resultsAutomated modelling pipelines rapidly developed easily reproducible data preprocessing and analysis steps, identification and optimization of the best performing model and provided outputs for interpreting feature importance. Unequal expression of life history states caused unbalanced classes, so we evaluated feature set importance using a weighted F1-score to balance model recall and precision among individual classes. Although the best model using the least restrictive feature set (only 24 hourly relocations in a day) produced effective classifications (weighted F1 = 0.887), models using all feature sets performed substantially better (weighted F1 = 0.95), particularly for rarer but demographically more impactful life history states (i.e., nesting).

conclusionsAutomated pipelines generated models producing highly accurate classifications of complex daily activity patterns using relatively low frequency GPS and incorporating more classes than previous GPS studies. Near real-time classification is possible which is ideal for time-sensitive needs such as identifying reproduction. Including habitat and longer sequences of spatial information produced more accurate classifications but incurred slight delays in processing.

Indexed as

AnatidaeAnimal behaviorAutomated model pipelineBiologgingClassificationDaily activityDaily activity routineGlobal positioning systemLife history stateSupervised machine learningTelemetryWaterfowl

Identifiers

PMID35578372
PMCPMC9109391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.