Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578326›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Psychometric evaluation of a nursing competence assessment tool among nursing students: a development and validation study.

Sheng-Miauh Huang, Su-Chen Fang, Chia-Tai Hung, Yi-Heng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Polish Adaptation of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng-Miauh HuangDepartment of Nursing, MacKay Medical College, No. 46, Section 3, Zhongzheng Rd., Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan. r910862@yahoo.com.tw.
Su-Chen FangDepartment of Nursing, MacKay Medical College, No. 46, Section 3, Zhongzheng Rd., Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan.
Chia-Tai HungDepartment of Nursing, MacKay Medical College, No. 46, Section 3, Zhongzheng Rd., Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan.
Yi-Heng ChenDepartment of Nursing, MacKay Medical College, No. 46, Section 3, Zhongzheng Rd., Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan.
Mackay Medical College · TW

Funding

MacKay Medical College MMC-RD-110-2B-P001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing competence refers to the core abilities that are required for fulfilling one's role as a nurse. A specific instrument comprehensively measuring competence among nursing students has not yet been developed. The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a nursing competence instrument for nursing students in bachelor training.

methodsA descriptive and explorative study design was used. Data were collected from students at one medical college in Taiwan in 2020 and 2021. A total of 241 nursing students participated in this study. We developed the initial instrument through systematic review, expert evaluations, and pilot versions. Its validity was then tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and criterion-related validity, while its reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest analysis.

resultsThe final fit indexes of CFA were as follows: chi-square = 860.1 (p < 0.01), normed chi-square = 2.24, SRMR = 0.04, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.94, and TLI = 0.94. Cronbach's alpha values for the subscales observed ranged from 0.91 to 0.98. The test-retest reliability coefficient for the Nurse Competence Scale was 0.515 (n = 30, p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe instrument exhibited acceptable psychometric properties, thereby proving itself a valuable tool for evaluating nursing students' competence at bachelor training. Further assessments of its reliability, validity, and generality from mentors' and scholars' views in different contexts and cultures are recommended.

Indexed as

Students, NursingFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCompetenceInstrument developmentNursing studentsReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID35578326
PMCPMC9109292
OpenAlexW4280543053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.