Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578320›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Rwanda: a trend analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2000 to 2019-20.

Peter M Kibe, Grace Wambura Mbuthia, Duncan N Shikuku, Catherine Akoth, James Odhiambo Oguta, Loise Ng'ang'a, Samwel Maina Gatimu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter M KibeAfrican Population and Health Research Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. kybkibe@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9027-9054
Grace Wambura MbuthiaDepartment of Community Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-5249
Duncan N ShikukuLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-7077
Catherine AkothInstitute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-3490
James Odhiambo OgutaSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-9895
Loise Ng'ang'aPartners in Health, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-0780
Samwel Maina GatimuDepartment of Economics, Population and Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8331-4536
University of Nairobi · KEAfrican Population and Health Research Center · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KELiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean section (CS) is an important medical intervention for reducing the risk of poor perinatal outcomes. However, CS trends in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continue to increase yet maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity remain high. Rwanda, like many other countries in SSA, has shown an increasing trend in the use of CS. This study assessed the trends and factors associated with CS delivery in Rwanda over the past two decades.

methodsWe used nationally representative child datasets from the Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2000 to 2019-20. All births in the preceding 3 years to the survey were assessed for the mode of delivery. The participants' characteristics, trends and the prevalence of CS were analysed using frequencies and percentages. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess the factors associated with population and hospital-based CS in Rwanda for each of the surveys.

resultsThe population-based rate of CS in Rwanda significantly increased from 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.6) in 2000 to 15.6% (95% CI 13.9-16.5) in 2019-20. Despite increasing in all health facilities over time, the rate of CS was about four times higher in private (60.6%) compared to public health facilities (15.4%) in 2019-20. The rates and odds of CS were disproportionately high among women of high socioeconomic groups, those who resided in Kigali city, had multiple pregnancies, and attended at least four antenatal care visits while the odds of CS were significantly lower among multiparous women and those who had female babies.

conclusionOver the past two decades, the rate of CS use in Rwanda increased significantly at health facility and population level with high regional and socio-economic disparities. There is a need to examine the disparities in CS trends and developing tailored policy guidelines to ensure proper use of CS in Rwanda.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionInfant MortalityChildFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrevalenceRwandaCaesarean sectionEastern AfricaMaternal healthMaternal mortalityRwandaWomen

Identifiers

PMID35578320
PMCPMC9112592
OpenAlexW4280507700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.