Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578297›Full record

Trial reportJournal of foot and ankle research2022

Adolescent perspectives on participating in a feasibility trial investigating shoe inserts for patellofemoral pain.

Isobel C O'Sullivan, Nathalia Cordeiro da Costa, Melinda M Franettovich Smith, Bill Vicenzino, Kay M Crossley, Steven J Kamper, Marienke van Middelkoop, Hylton B Menz, Kylie Tucker, Karina T O'Leary and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Isobel C O'SullivanSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nathalia Cordeiro da CostaSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Melinda M Franettovich SmithSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Bill VicenzinoSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kay M CrossleyLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Steven J KamperFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Marienke van MiddelkoopDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC Medical University Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hylton B MenzSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kylie TuckerSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Karina T O'LearySurgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Services, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Australia.
Natalie J CollinsSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. n.collins1@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-0192
The University of Queensland · AULa Trobe University · AUErasmus MC · NLThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1135995National Health and Medical Research Council 1194769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatellofemoral pain (PFP) affects one-quarter of adolescents, yet there are few evidence-informed recommendations to treat PFP in this population. HAPPi Kneecaps! is a randomised, controlled, participant- and assessor-blind, parallel-group feasibility trial of shoe inserts for adolescents with PFP. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore adolescents' perspectives of participating in HAPPi Kneecaps!.

methodsAll 36 adolescents with PFP from the HAPPi Kneecaps! study were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. We used a descriptive qualitative methodology underpinned by a relativist framework to investigate adolescents' perspectives on participating in the trial. Inductive thematic analysis was used to examine patterns regarding how each adolescent experienced the HAPPi Kneecaps! study within their social, cultural, and historical contexts.

results14 out of 36 HAPPi Kneecaps! participants provided consent and participated in interviews (12 females; mean [SD] age 14.9 [2.4] years). Overall, most adolescents responded positively when discussing their experience, such as improvements in their knee pain and satisfaction with how the study was run. Major themes that were generated from the analysis and feedback were: (1) shoe inserts require little effort to use; (2) perceptions of the program were generally positive; (3) participation in the trial could be made easier; (4) warm weather matters; and (5) life happens.

conclusionAdolescents with PFP who participated in the HAPPi Kneecaps! study found that shoe inserts were easy to wear. Most adolescents experienced an improvement in their symptoms and enhanced participation in sport and exercise. Adolescents with PFP prefer an option for warmer climates (e.g. flip flops or sandals), access to online logbooks, and clinicians who are easily accessible.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000957190 . Date registered: 8/07/2019.

Indexed as

AdolescentAustraliaDouble-Blind MethodExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatellaPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeSeasonsShoesSportsAdolescentsFeasibilityFoot orthosesPatellofemoral painQualitative

Identifiers

PMID35578297
PMCPMC9109440
OpenAlexW4280611234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.