Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022
Termination-of-resuscitation rule in the emergency department for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional cerebral oxygen saturation as an adjunctive tool for termination-of-resuscitation decisions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Reevaluating basic life support termination criteria using post-arrival data in Japanese out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Applicability of Emergency Department Termination-of-Resuscitation Rules in Super-Elderly Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- External validation of the Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation (P-ROSC) score for predicting prehospital return of spontaneous circulation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Functional Outcome and Independence Among In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in South India: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Distinguishing Subtypes of Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Estimated Last Seen Alive Time.Prehospital emergency care · 2026Article
- Different Resuscitation Termination Criteria for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest; A Prognostic Accuracy Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Bahrain: National retrospective cohort study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Optimal timing of ultra-early diffusion-weighted MRI in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients based on a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Influences on the duration and success of out-of-hospital resuscitation of geriatric patients over 80 years of age - a retrospective evaluation.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Verification of the termination of resuscitation rules in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- The ABC (Age, Bystander, and Cardiogram) score for predicting neurological outcomes of cardiac arrests without pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation: A nationwide population-based study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Impact of pandemic-related movement restriction on public access defibrillation in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Impact of Heavy Snowfall on Emergency Transport and Prognosis of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: A Nation-Wide Cohort Study.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2023Article
- A Machine Learning Prediction Model for Non-cardiogenic Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Non-shockable Rhythm.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2023Article
- Prediction Models for Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.Emergency medicine international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Japan, emergency medical service (EMS) providers are prohibited from field termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. In 2013, we developed a TOR rule for emergency department physicians (Goto's TOR rule) immediately after hospital arrival. However, this rule is subject to flaws, and there is a need for revision owing to its relatively low specificity for predicting mortality compared with other TOR rules in the emergency department. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a modified Goto's TOR rule by considering prehospital EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration.
methodsWe analysed the records of 465,657 adult patients with OHCA from the All-Japan Utstein registry from 2016 to 2019 and divided them into two groups: development (n = 231,363) and validation (n = 234,294). The primary outcome measures were specificity, false-positive rate (FPR), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised TOR rule in the emergency department for predicting 1-month mortality.
resultsRecursive partitioning analysis for the development group in predicting 1-month mortality revealed that a modified Goto's TOR rule could be defined if patients with OHCA met the following four criteria: (1) initial asystole, (2) unwitnessed arrest by any laypersons, (3) EMS-CPR duration > 20 min, and (4) no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The specificity, FPR, and PPV of the rule for predicting 1-month mortality were 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.0-99.4%), 0.8% (0.6-1.0%), and 99.8% (99.8-99.9%), respectively. The proportion of patients who fulfilled the rule and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 27.5% (95% CI 27.3-27.7%) and 0.904 (0.902-0.905), respectively. In the validation group, the specificity, FPR, PPV, proportion of patients who met the rule, and AUC were 99.1% (95% CI 98.9-99.2%), 0.9% (0.8-1.1%), 99.8% (99.8-99.8%), 27.8% (27.6-28.0%), and 0.889 (0.887-0.891), respectively.
conclusionThe modified Goto's TOR rule (which includes the following four criteria: initial asystole, unwitnessed arrest, EMS-CPR duration > 20 min, and no prehospital ROSC) with a > 99% predictor of 1-month mortality is a reliable tool for physicians treating refractory OHCAs immediately after hospital arrival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.