Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578226›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2022

Association between continuity of care (COC), healthcare use and costs: what can we learn from claims data? A rapid review.

Anna Nicolet, Muaamar Al-Gobari, Clémence Perraudin, Joël Wagner, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, Joachim Marti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cost savings from primary care clinic continuity among patients with chronic disease in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective population-level cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Continuity of Care and Risks of Hospitalization and Mortality in COPD: A Nationwide Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Central and Eastern European Migrants in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review of the Reasons for Utilisation of Transnational Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna NicoletCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Biopôle 2 SV-A, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. Anna.Nicolet@unisante.ch.
Muaamar Al-GobariCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Biopôle 2 SV-A, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clémence PerraudinCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Biopôle 2 SV-A, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joël WagnerDepartment of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC), and Swiss Finance Institute, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Biopôle 2 SV-A, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joachim Marti *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Biopôle 2 SV-A, Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 407440_183447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe how longitudinal continuity of care (COC) is measured using claims-based data and to review its association with healthcare use and costs. RESEARCH

designRapid review of the literature.

methodsWe searched Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane Central, manually checked the references of included studies, and hand-searched websites for potentially additional eligible studies.

resultsWe included 46 studies conducted in North America, East Asia and Europe, which used 14 COC indicators. Most reported studies (39/46) showed that higher COC was associated with lower healthcare use and costs. Most studies (37/46) adjusted for possible time bias and discussed causality between the outcomes and COC, or at least acknowledged the lack of it as a limitation.

conclusionsWhereas a wide range of indicators is used to measure COC in claims-based data, associations between COC and healthcare use and costs were consistent, showing lower healthcare use and costs with higher COC. Results were observed in various population groups from multiple countries and settings. Further research is needed to make stronger causal claims.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareAsia, EasternEuropeHumansNorth AmericaClaims-based dataContinuity of careCostsHealthcare use

Identifiers

PMID35578226
PMCPMC9112559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.