ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2022
Effect of Different Absorption Enhancers on the Nasal Absorption of Nalmefene Hydrochloride.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Subtle Molecular Differences in the Morphinan Opioid Antagonists Affect Their Physicochemical and In Vitro ADME Properties.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of a ketamine-dodecyl maltoside combination using angiogenesis and embryonic development models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ketamine and dodecyl maltoside synergy as a potential topical therapeutic approach for melanoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Absorption for Intranasal Delivery of Drugs Targeting the Central Nervous System Using Alkylsaccharide Permeation Enhancers.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Paclitaxel Delivery to the Brain for Glioblastoma Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Mucoadhesion and Mucopenetration in the Immune Response Induced by Polymer-Based Mucosal Adjuvants.Polymers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to explore the effects of novel absorption enhancers on the nasal absorption of nalmefene hydrochloride (NMF). First, the influence of absorption enhancers with different concentrations and types and drug concentrations on the nasal absorption of NMF was investigated in vivo in rats. The absorption enhancers studied include n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM), hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), and polyethylene glycol (15)-hydroxy Stearate (Solutol®HS15). At the same time, the in situ toad palate model and rat nasal mucosa model were used to assess the cilia toxicity. The results showed that all the absorption enhancers investigated significantly promote the nasal absorption of NMF, but with different degrees and trends. Among them, the 0.5% (w/v) DDM had the strongest enhancement effect, followed by 0.5% (w/v) Solutol®HS15, 0.25% (w/v) DDM, 0.25% (w/v) Solutol®HS15, 0.1% (w/v) Solutol®HS15, 0.1% (w/v) DDM, and 0.25% (w/v) HP-β-CD, with absolute bioavailability of 76.49%, 72.14%, 71.00%, 69.46%, 60.41%, 59.42%, and 55.18%, respectively. All absorption enhancers exhibited good safety profiles in nasal ciliary toxicity tests. From the perspective of enhancing effect and safety, we considered DDM to be a promising nasal absorption enhancer. And in addition to DDM, Solutol®HS15 can also promote intranasal absorption of NMF, which will provide another option for the development of nalmefene hydrochloride nasal spray.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.