Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35578128›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Factors Related to Delayed Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Ana Paula Bhering Nogueira, Ana Paula Drummond-Lage, Gustavo Drummond Pinho Ribeiro, Estevão Ferreira Leite, Marcus Henrique Xavier, Alberto Julius Alves Wainstein

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula Bhering NogueiraFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil.
Ana Paula Drummond-LageFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil. anapdru@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0289-8953
Gustavo Drummond Pinho RibeiroFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil.
Estevão Ferreira LeiteFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil.
Marcus Henrique XavierFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil.
Alberto Julius Alves WainsteinFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Centro, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130130, Brazil. albertojaw@gmail.com.
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais · BREzequiel Dias Foundation · BRHospital Felício Rocho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, 75% of the population uses the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), public health system, where the general practitioner (GP) is responsible for melanoma diagnosis. Identify the factors related to the delay in diagnosing melanoma patients assisted by SUS. A prospective observational study based on a questionnaire and medical records review assessed the sociodemographic features, melanoma signs and symptoms, previous knowledge of the disease, and factors related to delays in seeking medical care. One hundred sixty-six patients were included. Healthcare professionals suspected a lesion in only 23.5% of cases. The average time between lesion suspicion by patient/relative and first medical appointment with GP was over 6 months (31%). The time between the first GP exam and biopsy conducted by a specialist ranged from less than 1 month (34.9%) to more than 1 year (18.7%). Half of the patients (49.4%) experienced delays in histopathological diagnosis due to SUS bureaucracy/slowness. Most (80%) patients did not know what melanoma was before diagnosis. Delay in melanoma diagnosis was related to a lack of knowledge about the disease's signs and symptoms for both the study population and the primary physicians, indicating that both players must receive proper education about melanoma. Also, the infrastructure and work processed at SUS impeded the patient flow, contributing to the diagnosis of the lesions at more advanced stages.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBrazilCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDelayed DiagnosisHumansPublic HealthDiagnosisEducationHealth system accessMelanomaPublic health system

Identifiers

PMID35578128
OpenAlexW4280591891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.