Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35577996›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2022

Patterns of Service Use in Intensive Case Management: A Six Year Longitudinal Study.

Philippe Golay, Charles Bonsack, Benedetta Silva, Guillaume Pauli, Eva de Boer, Stéphane Morandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philippe GolayService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland. Philippe.golay@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-6241
Charles BonsackService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benedetta SilvaService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Guillaume PauliService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eva de BoerService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane MorandiService of Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Consultations de Chauderon, Chauderon 18, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An Intensive Case Management (ICM) intervention has been developed in Lausanne, Switzerland. It aims to promote access to care for people with severe mental disorders who have difficulties to engage with mental health services because of the severity of their disorders and/or their marginality. ICM embrace components of assertive community treatment and critical time intervention. It is time limited and focused on critical phases of recovery. The goal of this study was to examine the heterogeneity of service use patterns of people who required ICM interventions and identify differences in patterns of duration and timing of the intervention. Records of 471 patients from the Department of Psychiatry of Lausanne University Hospital for whom the ICM team intervention was requested were analysed over a 6 year period with discrete sequential-state analysis. Trajectories could be split between six meaningful clusters including service light use and critical time intervention (58.0%), transition to long-term regular ambulatory-care (11.3%), partial transition to ambulatory care (14.4%), alternative to hospitalization (10.4%), continued ICM (4.9%) and long hospital stays (1.1%). Diagnoses of substance abuse were overrepresented among heavy users and diagnoses of schizophrenia were the most frequent diagnostic overall. Profiles of service use for ICM patients were very diverse. Long term interventions were frequently not necessary. A time-limited intervention was likely sufficient to stabilize the situation and/or engage the patient in care. A small number of situations required a sustained and long-term investment and did not always allowed for a reduction in the need for hospitalization. A general reflection on alternatives to hospitalization must be pursued, in particular for these patients.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersSchizophreniaCase ManagementHospitalizationHumansLength of StayLongitudinal StudiesAssertive community treatmentIntensive case-managementPatternsPsychiatric hospitalizationService use

Identifiers

PMID35577996
PMCPMC9393144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.