ReviewNature microbiology2022
Ethical microbiome research with Indigenous communities.
Review in Nature microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Distinct trajectories of urbanization shape the human gut microbiome across South Asia.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- DNA sequencing for microbial surveillance in cystic fibrosis airways: advances, challenges, and clinical translation.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Participant engagement and feedback in microbiome projects: a case of AWI-Gen 2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Toward ethical human microbiome research: improving health through radical interdisciplinary and intercultural co-laboration.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Article
- Distinct trajectories of urbanization shape the human gut microbiome across South Asia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Microbiome stewardship: definition and guiding principles for implementation.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic and functional co-diversification imprint African Hominidae microbiomes to signal dietary and lifestyle adaptations.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Analyzing human gut microbiome data from global populations: challenges and resources.Trends in microbiology · 2025Review
- Prioritizing precision: guidelines for the better use of population descriptors in human microbiome research.mSystems · 2025Review
- Expanding the human gut microbiome atlas of Africa.Nature · 2025Article
- Oral microbial diversity in 18th century African individuals from South Carolina.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Hunter-gatherer genetics research: Importance and avenues.Evolutionary human sciences · 2024Article
- Uncovering the Holocene roots of contemporary disease-scapes: bringing archaeology into One Health.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Challenges and opportunities in sharing microbiome data and analyses.Nature microbiology · 2023Review
- Microbiome ownership for Indigenous peoples.Nature microbiology · 2023Review
- A relational framework for microbiome research with Indigenous communities.Nature microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human-microbiome interactions have been associated with evolutionary, cultural and environmental processes. With clinical applications of microbiome research now feasible, it is crucial that the science conducted, particularly among Indigenous communities, adheres to principles of inclusion. This necessitates a transdisciplinary dialogue to decide how biological samples are collected and who benefits from the research and any derived products. As a group of scholars working at the interface of biological and social science, we offer a candid discussion of the lessons learned from our own research and introduce one approach to carry out ethical microbiome research with Indigenous communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35577973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.