Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35577884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A machine learning approach to predict resilience and sickness absence in the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Johannes Lieslehto, Noora Rantanen, Lotta-Maria A H Oksanen, Sampo A Oksanen, Anne Kivimäki, Susanna Paju, Milla Pietiäinen, Laura Lahdentausta, Pirkko Pussinen, Veli-Jukka Anttila and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes Lieslehto *Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. johannes.lieslehto@niuva.fi.
Noora Rantanen *Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lotta-Maria A H OksanenFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sampo A OksanenNordic Healthcare Group, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne KivimäkiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Susanna PajuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Milla PietiäinenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Laura LahdentaustaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirkko PussinenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Veli-Jukka AnttilaFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lasse LehtonenFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ahmed GeneidFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Enni SanmarkFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIAalto University · FINiuvanniemi Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) have faced unprecedented workloads and personal health risks leading to mental disorders and surges in sickness absence. Previous work has shown that interindividual differences in psychological resilience might explain why only some individuals are vulnerable to these consequences. However, no prognostic tools to predict individual HCW resilience during the pandemic have been developed. We deployed machine learning (ML) to predict psychological resilience during the pandemic. The models were trained in HCWs of the largest Finnish hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (HUS, N = 487), with a six-month follow-up, and prognostic generalizability was evaluated in two independent HCW validation samples (Social and Health Services in Kymenlaakso: Kymsote, N = 77 and the City of Helsinki, N = 322) with similar follow-ups never used for training the models. Using the most predictive items to predict future psychological resilience resulted in a balanced accuracy (BAC) of 72.7-74.3% in the HUS sample. Similar performances (BAC = 67-77%) were observed in the two independent validation samples. The models' predictions translated to a high probability of sickness absence during the pandemic. Our results provide the first evidence that ML techniques could be harnessed for the early detection of COVID-19-related distress among HCWs, thereby providing an avenue for potential targeted interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansMachine LearningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Workforce

Identifiers

PMID35577884
PMCPMC9109448
OpenAlexW4280494864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.