ArticleVision research2022
Top-down control of attention by stereoscopic depth.
Article in Vision research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention in depth: perceptual load modulates distractor interference in a three-dimensional space.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Prior cueing affects the saccadic response to targets in the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Orienting attention across binocular disparity.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Integration and suppression interact in binocular vision.Journal of vision · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stereoscopic depth has a mixed record as a guiding attribute in visual attention. Visual search can be efficient if the target lies at a unique depth; whereas automatic segmentation of search arrays into different depth planes does not appear to be pre-attentive. These prior findings describe bottom-up, stimulus-driven depth guidance. Here, we ask about the top-down selection of depth information. To assess the ability to direct attention to specific depth planes, Experiment 1 used the centroid judgment paradigm which permits quantitative measures of selective processing of items of different depths or colors. Experiment 1 showed that a subset of observers could deploy specific attention filters for each of eight depth planes, suggesting that at least some observers can direct attention to a specific depth plane quite precisely. Experiment 2 used eight depth planes in a visual search experiment. Observers were encouraged to guide their attention to far or near depth planes with an informative but imperfect cue. The benefits of this probabilistic cue were small. However, this may not be a specific problem with guidance by stereoscopic depth. Equivalently poor results were obtained with color. To check and prove that depth guidance in search is possible, Experiment 3 presented items in only two depth planes. In this case, information about the target depth plane allows observers to search more efficiently, replicating earlier work. We conclude that top-down guidance by stereoscopic depth is possible but that it is hard to apply the full range of our stereoscopic ability in search.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.