Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35576824›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

A lightweight CNN-based network on COVID-19 detection using X-ray and CT images.

Mei-Ling Huang, Yu-Chieh Liao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mei-Ling HuangDepartment of Industrial Engineering & Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, 57, Sec. 2, Zhongshan Rd., Taiping Dist., Taichung, 411030, Taiwan. Electronic address: huangml@ncut.edu.tw.
Yu-Chieh LiaoDepartment of Industrial Engineering & Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, 57, Sec. 2, Zhongshan Rd., Taiping Dist., Taichung, 411030, Taiwan.
National Chin-Yi University of Technology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe traditional method of detecting COVID-19 disease mainly rely on the interpretation of computer tomography (CT) or X-ray images (X-ray) by doctors or professional researchers to identify whether it is COVID-19 disease, which is easy to cause identification mistakes. In this study, the technology of convolutional neural network is expected to be able to efficiently and accurately identify the COVID-19 disease.

methodsThis study uses and fine-tunes seven convolutional neural networks including InceptionV3, ResNet50V2, Xception, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, and EfficientNetV2 on COVID-19 detection. In addition, we proposes a lightweight convolutional neural network, LightEfficientNetV2, on small number of chest X-ray and CT images. Five-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the performance of each model. To confirm the performance of the proposed model, LightEfficientNetV2 was carried out on three different datasets (NIH Chest X-rays, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-CT).

resultsOn chest X-ray image dataset, the highest accuracy 96.50% was from InceptionV3 before fine-tuning; and the highest accuracy 97.73% was from EfficientNetV2 after fine-tuning. The accuracy of the LightEfficientNetV2 model proposed in this study is 98.33% on chest X-ray image. On CT images, the best transfer learning model before fine-tuning is MobileNetV2, with an accuracy of 94.46%; the best transfer learning model after fine-tuning is Xception, with an accuracy of 96.78%. The accuracy of the LightEfficientNetV2 model proposed in this study is 97.48% on CT image.

conclusionsCompared with the SOTA, LightEfficientNetV2 proposed in this study demonstrates promising performance on chest X-ray images, CT images and three different datasets.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningComputersHumansSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedX-RaysComputer tomographyCOVID-19Transfer learningX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35576824
PMCPMC9090861
OpenAlexW4280493037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.