ArticleJournal of biomechanics2022
Quantification of the heterogeneous effect of static and dynamic perivascular structures on patient-specific local aortic wall mechanics using inverse finite element modeling and DENSE MRI.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correction of phase offset errors and quantification of background noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and encoded-displacement uncertainty on DENSE MRI for kinematics of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2024Article
- Strain estimation in aortic roots from 4D echocardiographic images using medial modeling and deformable registration.Medical image analysis · 2023Article
- The biomechanical effects of different membrane layer structures and material constitutive modeling on patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Patient-Specific Inverse Modeling of In Vivo Cardiovascular Mechanics with Medical Image-Derived Kinematics as Input Data: Concepts, Methods, and Applications.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the relevance of perivascular interactions on aortic wall mechanics. Most of the approaches assume static perivascular structures; however, the beating heart dynamically displaces the neighboring aorta. We develop a model to account for the effect of periaortic interactions due to static and dynamic structures by prescribing a moving elastic foundation boundary condition (EFBC) embedded into an inverse finite element algorithm using in vivo displacements from 2D displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MRI as target data. We applied this method at three different locations of interest, the distal aortic arch (DAA), descending thoracic aorta (DTA), and infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA) for a total of 27 cases in healthy humans. The model reproduces the target diastole-to-systole deformation and bulk displacement of the aortic wall with median displacement errors below 0.5mm. The EFBC showed good agreement with the location of anatomical features and was consistent among individuals of similar characteristics. Results show that an energy source acting on the adventitia is required to reproduce the displacements measured at the vicinity of the heart, but not at the abdomen. The average adventitial load as a percentage of the luminal pulse-pressure was found to increase with age and to decrease along the descending aorta, from 61% at the DAA to 37% at the DTA, and 30% at the IAA. This approach offers a patient-specific method to estimate in vivo adventitial loads and aortic wall stiffness, which can bring a better understanding of normal and pathological in vivo aortic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.