Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35576631›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2022

Quantification of the heterogeneous effect of static and dynamic perivascular structures on patient-specific local aortic wall mechanics using inverse finite element modeling and DENSE MRI.

Johane H Bracamonte, John S Wilson, Joao S Soares

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johane H BracamonteDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 West Main Street, Richmond, VA 23284, United States. Electronic address: bracamontej@vcu.edu.
John S WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 601 West Main Street, Richmond, VA 23284, United States. Electronic address: jswilson3@vcu.edu.
Joao S SoaresDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 West Main Street, Richmond, VA 23284, United States. Electronic address: jsoares@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the relevance of perivascular interactions on aortic wall mechanics. Most of the approaches assume static perivascular structures; however, the beating heart dynamically displaces the neighboring aorta. We develop a model to account for the effect of periaortic interactions due to static and dynamic structures by prescribing a moving elastic foundation boundary condition (EFBC) embedded into an inverse finite element algorithm using in vivo displacements from 2D displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MRI as target data. We applied this method at three different locations of interest, the distal aortic arch (DAA), descending thoracic aorta (DTA), and infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA) for a total of 27 cases in healthy humans. The model reproduces the target diastole-to-systole deformation and bulk displacement of the aortic wall with median displacement errors below 0.5mm. The EFBC showed good agreement with the location of anatomical features and was consistent among individuals of similar characteristics. Results show that an energy source acting on the adventitia is required to reproduce the displacements measured at the vicinity of the heart, but not at the abdomen. The average adventitial load as a percentage of the luminal pulse-pressure was found to increase with age and to decrease along the descending aorta, from 61% at the DAA to 37% at the DTA, and 30% at the IAA. This approach offers a patient-specific method to estimate in vivo adventitial loads and aortic wall stiffness, which can bring a better understanding of normal and pathological in vivo aortic function.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalAorta, ThoracicFinite Element AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdventitial loadsAortaData assimilationDENSE MRIImage-based modelingInverse modelIn vivo functionPeriaortic interactionsPerivascular supportTethering

Identifiers

PMID35576631
PMCPMC9536506
OpenAlexW4228998902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.